Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
80-91005 Généré par l'IA

Inadmissibility of Appeal Due to Failure to Elect Domicile

Numéro de cause 80-91005
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction France (FR)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Irrecevable (Inadmissible)
Frais judiciaires à la charge du recourant
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A civil party's appeal against a decision of non-lieu by the investigating judge was declared inadmissible as tardy by the Chamber of Accusation because the appellant, domiciled in a different department, failed to elect domicile at the registry of the competent court as required by Article 89, paragraph 2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, thereby preventing the application of the time extension provisions of Article 217, paragraph 3; consequently, the subsequent appeal in cassation, filed beyond the statutory period, was declared inadmissible, and the appellant was ordered to pay a fine and costs.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

ARTICLE 89 ALINEA 2 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE PENALE, ARTICLE 568 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE PENALE, CONDAMNE LE DEMANDEUR A L'AMENDE ET AUX DEPENS; Inadmissibility of Appeal Due to Failure to Elect Domicile: A civil party's appeal against a decision of non-lieu by the investigating judge was declared inadmissible as tardy by the Chamber of Accusation because the appellant, domiciled in a different department, failed to elect domicile at the registry of the competent court as required by Article 89, paragraph 2 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, thereby preventing the application of the time extension provisions of Article 217, paragraph 3; consequently, the subsequent appeal in cassation, filed beyond the statutory period, was declared inadmissible, and the appellant was ordered to pay a fine and costs.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
domicile d'une partie commandement de payer article du CPC qualité pour recourir expulsion d'un logement recours en carence

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
ARTICLE 89 ALINEA 2 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE PENALE
This article was applied to determine that the civil party could not invoke the provisions of Article 217 al. 3 of the same Code, leading to the appeal being declared late.
ARTICLE 568 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE PENALE
The court used this article to establish that the appeal in cassation was filed outside the prescribed time limit.
CONDAMNE LE DEMANDEUR A L'AMENDE ET AUX DEPENS
The dispositive orders the applicant to pay a fine and costs.
Généré par l'IA
75-90899
Civil Party Domicile Election and Appeal Timeliness
20-18635
Appeal Inadmissibility Due to Incorrect Domicile
2216764
Dismissal of Appeal for Failure to Elect Domicile
90-84672
Civil Party Appeal Inadmissibility Due to Late Filing
2300398
Claimant's Failure to Elect Domicile Renders Appeal Inadmissible

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
ARTICLE 89 ALINEA 2 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE PENALE

This article was applied to determine that the civil party could not invoke the provisions of Article 217 al. 3 of the same Code, leading to the appeal being declared late.

ARTICLE 568 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE PENALE

The court used this article to establish that the appeal in cassation was filed outside the prescribed time limit.

CONDAMNE LE DEMANDEUR A L'AMENDE ET AUX DEPENS

The dispositive orders the applicant to pay a fine and costs.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

VU LE MEMOIRE PRODUIT ;

SUR LA RECEVABILITE DU POURVOI ;

ATTENDU QUE PAR ARRET EN DATE DU 22 JANVIER 1980, LA CHAMBRE D'ACCUSATION A DECLARE IRRECEVABLE COMME TARDIF L'APPEL INTERJETE PAR X..., PARTIE CIVILE, D'UNE ORDONNANCE DE NON-LIEU RENDUE PAR LE JUGE D'INSTRUCTION DE NANTERRE ;

ATTENDU QUE X..., DOMICILIE DANS LE DEPARTEMENT DU VAL-D'OISE, N'AYANT PAS FAIT ELECTION DE DOMICILE, PAR ACTE AU GREFFE DU TRIBUNAL DE GRANDE INSTANCE DE NANTERRE DANS LE RESSORT DUQUEL SE FAISAIT L'INSTRUCTION, LA PARTIE CIVILE NE POUVAIT, PAR APPLICATION DE L'ARTICLE 89 ALINEA 2 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE PENALE, SE PREVALOIR DES DISPOSITIONS DE L'ARTICLE 217 ALINEA 3 DU MEME CODE ; D'OU IL SUIT QUE LE DEMANDEUR, QUI A FORME SON POURVOI EN CASSATION LE 8 FEVRIER 1980, ETAIT HORS DU DELAI PREVU PAR L'ARTICLE 568 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE PENALE ; QU'IL EN RESULTE QUE LE POURVOI N'EST PAS RECEVABLE ;

DECLARE LE POURVOI IRRECEVABLE ;

CONDAMNE LE DEMANDEUR A L'AMENDE ET AUX DEPENS.