Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
82-91927 Généré par l'IA

Pau Court of Appeal Civil Damages Indemnification Inadmissibility of Appeal Brief

Numéro de cause 82-91927
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction France (FR)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

An individual appealed a decision from the Pau Court of Appeal that held them fully responsible for damages resulting from an accident, despite the criminal infractions having been amnestied, and consequently awarded civil damages. The Court of Cassation rejected the appeal because the personal brief submitted by the appellant was inadmissible; having been sent directly to the Court of Appeal's registry rather than being deposited with the registry of the court that rendered the challenged decision within the ten-day period stipulated by the Code of Criminal Procedure, it could not be properly presented before the Court of Cassation by the appellant, who was only civilly condemned, as they were required to appear through a lawyer for the Supreme Court.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

ARTICLE 585 DU MEME CODE, ARTICLE 584 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE PENALE; Pau Court of Appeal Civil Damages Indemnification Inadmissibility of Appeal Brief: The Court of Cassation rejected the appeal because the personal brief submitted by the appellant was inadmissible; having been sent directly to the Court of Appeal's registry rather than being deposited with the registry of the court that rendered the challenged decision within the ten-day period stipulated by the Code of Criminal Procedure, it could not be properly presented before the Court of Cassation by the appellant, who was only civilly condemned, as they were required to appear through a lawyer for the Supreme Court.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
code de procédure civile entraide judiciaire civile qualité pour recourir cognition du pourvoi en cassation abus de droit procédure préjudicielle

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
ARTICLE 585 DU MEME CODE
The court ruled that the appellant's personal brief could not be regularly presented before the Court of Cassation because it was not filed with the Court of Appeal within the time limit set by Article 584 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
ARTICLE 584 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE PENALE
This article sets the deadline (10 days) for filing the brief with the Court of Appeal, which, if not respected, makes the submission before the Court of Cassation irregular under Article 585.
Généré par l'IA
95-40970
Appeal Inadmissibility and Cross-Appeal Rejection Regarding Pau Court of Appeal Ruling
88-40622
Appeal Inadmissible Due to Unspecified Grounds for Cassation
88-82997
Civil Party Appeal Inadmissible Due to Unsigned Brief in Involuntary Injury Case
06-80891
Appeal Inadmissibility Due to Unsigned Supporting Brief
95-40077
Appeal Inadmissibility Due to Unstated Grounds and Unsigned Brief

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
ARTICLE 585 DU MEME CODE

The court ruled that the appellant's personal brief could not be regularly presented before the Court of Cassation because it was not filed with the Court of Appeal within the time limit set by Article 584 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

ARTICLE 584 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE PENALE

This article sets the deadline (10 days) for filing the brief with the Court of Appeal, which, if not respected, makes the submission before the Court of Cassation irregular under Article 585.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

STATUANT SUR LE POURVOI FORME PAR :

- X... ALAIN,

CONTRE UN ARRET DE LA COUR D'APPEL DE PAU, CHAMBRE CORRECTIONNELLE, EN DATE DU 28 AVRIL 1982, QUI, DANS UNE PROCEDURE SUIVIE CONTRE LUI DU CHEF DE BLESSURES INVOLONTAIRES ET CONTRAVENTION AU CODE DE LA ROUTE, L'A DECLARE ENTIEREMENT RESPONSABLE DES CONSEQUENCES DOMMAGEABLES DE L'ACCIDENT, A MIS HORS DE CAUSE LE CIVILEMENT RESPONSABLE ET A STATUE SUR LES INTERETS CIVILS ;

VU LE MEMOIRE PERSONNEL PRODUIT PAR LE DEMANDEUR ;

SUR LA RECEVABILITE DU MEMOIRE :

ATTENDU QUE X..., QUI S'EST POURVU EN CASSATION LE 3 MAI 1982 CONTRE UN ARRET DE LA COUR D'APPEL DE PAU EN DATE DU 28 AVRIL 1982 LE CONDAMNANT A DES REPARATIONS CIVILES APRES AVOIR CONSTATE L'AMNISTIE DES CONTRAVENTIONS POURSUIVIES, A, SOUS SA SIGNATURE, REDIGE A L'APPUI DE SON POURVOI UN MEMOIRE QU'IL A TRANSMIS DIRECTEMENT, PAR LETTRE D'ENVOI NON DATEE, AU GREFFE DE LA COUR D'APPEL OU IL A ETE ENREGISTRE LE 19 MAI 1982 ;

MAIS ATTENDU QU'IL NE SAURAIT ETRE FAIT ETAT DE CE MEMOIRE QUI, N'AYANT PAS ETE DEPOSE AU GREFFE DE LA COUR D'APPEL QUI A RENDU LA DECISION ATTAQUEE DANS LE DELAI DE 10 JOURS IMPARTI PAR L'ARTICLE 584 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE PENALE, N'AURAIT PU, AUX TERMES DE L'ARTICLE 585 DU MEME CODE, ETRE REGULIEREMENT PRESENTE DEVANT LA COUR DE CASSATION PAR LE DEMANDEUR, NON CONDAMNE PENALEMENT, QUE PAR LE MINISTERE D'UN AVOCAT EN CETTE COUR ;

QU'AINSI LEDIT MEMOIRE NE SAISIT PAS LA COUR DE CASSATION DES MOYENS QUI POURRAIENT Y ETRE CONTENUS ;

ET ATTENDU QUE L'ARRET EST REGULIER EN LA FORME ;

REJETTE LE POURVOI.