Appeal Forfeiture Due to Failure to Post Surety for Fine
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe defendant, found guilty of violating check legislation but exempted from sentencing, appealed the decision; however, because the conviction did not include a custodial sentence, the defendant was required to post a surety for the fine under the relevant procedural code provisions, and since the defendant neither provided proof of the required surety nor submitted the supplementary documents mandated by law, the Court of Cassation declared the appeal forfeited.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAARTICLE 580, ARTICLE 469-1 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE PENALE, ARTICLE 581 DU MEME CODE; Appeal Forfeiture Due to Failure to Post Surety for Fine: The defendant, found guilty of violating check legislation but exempted from sentencing, appealed the decision; however, because the conviction did not include a custodial sentence, the defendant was required to post a surety for the fine under the relevant procedural code provisions, and since the defendant neither provided proof of the required surety nor submitted the supplementary documents mandated by law, the Court of Cassation declared the appeal forfeited.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IADispositions légales citées
Généré par l'IADécisions connexes
Généré par l'IAQuestions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe court applied this article to declare the appeal forfeited because the appellant failed to justify the deposit or produce the supplementary documents.
Cited as the basis under which the appealed decision dispensed the appellant from punishment.
Cited in reasoning to establish that the appellant, not being sentenced to correctional or police imprisonment, was not exempt from depositing the fine.
Texte complet
DECHEANCE DU POURVOI FORME PAR X... (BERNARD), PREVENU, CONTRE UN ARRET DE LA COUR D'APPEL DE PARIS, EN DATE DU 23 FEVRIER 1976, QUI L'A DECLARE COUPABLE D'INFRACTION A LA LEGISLATION SUR LES CHEQUES MAIS L'A DISPENSE DE PEINE.
LA COUR, ATTENDU QU'IL APPERT DE L'ARRET ATTAQUE QUE X..., DECLARE COUPABLE D'INFRACTION A LA LEGISLATION SUR LES CHEQUES A, CONFORMEMENT AUX DISPOSITIONS DE L'ARTICLE 469-1 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE PENALE, ETE DISPENSE DE PEINE ;
ATTENDU QUE X..., QUI N'A PAS ETE CONDAMNE A L'EMPRISONNEMENT CORRECTIONNEL OU DE POLICE N'ETAIT PAS, AUX TERMES DE L'ARTICLE 581 DU MEME CODE, DISPENSE DE CONSIGNER L'AMENDE ;
ATTENDU QUE LE PREVENU QUI N'A NI JUSTIFIE DE LA CONSIGNATION NI PRODUIT LES PIECES SUPPLETIVES PREVUES PAR LA LOI DOIT, SUIVANT LES PRESCRIPTIONS DE L'ARTICLE 580, ETRE DECHU DE SON POURVOI ;
DECLARE X... DECHU DE SON POURVOI.