Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
76-91102 Généré par l'IA

Appeal Forfeiture Due to Failure to Post Surety for Fine

Numéro de cause 76-91102
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction France (FR)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige struck_off

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The defendant, found guilty of violating check legislation but exempted from sentencing, appealed the decision; however, because the conviction did not include a custodial sentence, the defendant was required to post a surety for the fine under the relevant procedural code provisions, and since the defendant neither provided proof of the required surety nor submitted the supplementary documents mandated by law, the Court of Cassation declared the appeal forfeited.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

ARTICLE 580, ARTICLE 469-1 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE PENALE, ARTICLE 581 DU MEME CODE; Appeal Forfeiture Due to Failure to Post Surety for Fine: The defendant, found guilty of violating check legislation but exempted from sentencing, appealed the decision; however, because the conviction did not include a custodial sentence, the defendant was required to post a surety for the fine under the relevant procedural code provisions, and since the defendant neither provided proof of the required surety nor submitted the supplementary documents mandated by law, the Court of Cassation declared the appeal forfeited.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
péremption fixation de la peine caution amendes impayées licenciement pour vol pourvoi en nullité

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
ARTICLE 580
The court applied this article to declare the appeal forfeited because the appellant failed to justify the deposit or produce the supplementary documents.
ARTICLE 469-1 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE PENALE
Cited as the basis under which the appealed decision dispensed the appellant from punishment.
ARTICLE 581 DU MEME CODE
Cited in reasoning to establish that the appellant, not being sentenced to correctional or police imprisonment, was not exempt from depositing the fine.
Généré par l'IA

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
ARTICLE 580

The court applied this article to declare the appeal forfeited because the appellant failed to justify the deposit or produce the supplementary documents.

ARTICLE 469-1 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE PENALE

Cited as the basis under which the appealed decision dispensed the appellant from punishment.

ARTICLE 581 DU MEME CODE

Cited in reasoning to establish that the appellant, not being sentenced to correctional or police imprisonment, was not exempt from depositing the fine.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

DECHEANCE DU POURVOI FORME PAR X... (BERNARD), PREVENU, CONTRE UN ARRET DE LA COUR D'APPEL DE PARIS, EN DATE DU 23 FEVRIER 1976, QUI L'A DECLARE COUPABLE D'INFRACTION A LA LEGISLATION SUR LES CHEQUES MAIS L'A DISPENSE DE PEINE.

LA COUR, ATTENDU QU'IL APPERT DE L'ARRET ATTAQUE QUE X..., DECLARE COUPABLE D'INFRACTION A LA LEGISLATION SUR LES CHEQUES A, CONFORMEMENT AUX DISPOSITIONS DE L'ARTICLE 469-1 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE PENALE, ETE DISPENSE DE PEINE ;

ATTENDU QUE X..., QUI N'A PAS ETE CONDAMNE A L'EMPRISONNEMENT CORRECTIONNEL OU DE POLICE N'ETAIT PAS, AUX TERMES DE L'ARTICLE 581 DU MEME CODE, DISPENSE DE CONSIGNER L'AMENDE ;

ATTENDU QUE LE PREVENU QUI N'A NI JUSTIFIE DE LA CONSIGNATION NI PRODUIT LES PIECES SUPPLETIVES PREVUES PAR LA LOI DOIT, SUIVANT LES PRESCRIPTIONS DE L'ARTICLE 580, ETRE DECHU DE SON POURVOI ;

DECLARE X... DECHU DE SON POURVOI.