Appeal Regarding Non-Revocation of Suspended Sentence Dismissed for Lack of Argument
France (FR)
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe appeal challenged a decision upholding the non-revocation of a suspended sentence with probation following an imprisonment penalty, where the original ruling was pronounced in the appellant's absence but was deemed a default judgment not subject to opposition under relevant articles of the Code of Criminal Procedure, thus making the appeal admissible as it was filed within the legal timeframe following service of the judgment, but the Court dismissed the appeal because the appellant presented no arguments to support the appeal, and the appealed decision was procedurally sound.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAREJETTE LE POURVOI, ARTICLES 735, ALINEA 2, ET 703 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE PENALE; Appeal Regarding Non-Revocation of Suspended Sentence Dismissed for Lack of Argument: The appeal challenged a decision upholding the non-revocation of a suspended sentence with probation following an imprisonment penalty, where the original ruling was pronounced in the appellant's absence but was deemed a default judgment not subject to opposition under relevant articles of the Code of Criminal Procedure, thus making the appeal admissible as it was filed within the legal timeframe following service of the judgment, but the Court dismissed the appeal because the appellant presented no arguments to support the appeal, and the appealed decision was procedurally sound.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IADispositions légales citées
Généré par l'IADécisions connexes
Généré par l'IAQuestions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe court explicitly rejected the appeal.
These articles were cited to establish the nature of the appealed decision and confirm the admissibility of the appeal (by exclusion of the opposition remedy).
Texte complet
REJET DU POURVOI FORME PAR X... (SERGE),
CONTRE UN ARRET DE LA COUR D'APPEL DE PARIS (9E CHAMBRE) DU 21 DECEMBRE 1976, QUI A REJETE LA DEMANDE TENDANT A LA NON-REVOCATION DU SURSIS AVEC MISE A L'EPREUVE ASSORTISSANT UNE PEINE D'EMPRISONNEMENT.
LA COUR, SUR LA RECEVABILITE DU POURVOI ;
ATTENDU QUE SI L'ARRET ATTAQUE CONSTATE QU'IL A ETE PRONONCE HORS LA PRESENCE DU DEMANDEUR, IL RESULTE CEPENDANT DE LA COMBINAISON DES ARTICLES 735, ALINEA 2, ET 703 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE PENALE QUE CETTE DECISION, BIEN QUE QUALIFIEE DE DECISION PAR DEFAUT, NE POUVAIT ETRE FRAPPEE D'OPPOSITION ;
CETTE VOIE DE RECOURS N'ETAIT PAS PREVUE PAR CES TEXTES ;
D'OU IL SUIT QUE LE POURVOI FORME DANS LE DELAI LEGAL QUI A COMMENCE A COURIR A COMPTER DE LA SIGNIFICATION DE L'ARRET EST RECEVABLE ;
AU FOND, ATTENDU QUE LE DEMANDEUR N'A PRODUIT AUCUN MOYEN A L'APPUI DU POURVOI ;
QUE L'ARRET ATTAQUE EST REGULIER EN LA FORME ;
REJETTE LE POURVOI.