Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
78-90639 Généré par l'IA

Inspector Murder Jurisdiction Dispute

Numéro de cause 78-90639
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction France (FR)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

An inspector charged with murder by an investigating judge was subject to a request for designation of jurisdiction based on a statute applicable to crimes committed by a judicial police officer within their territorial jurisdiction, whether in the exercise of their duties or not; however, the court rejected the request, reasoning that the statutory provisions are exhaustive and inapplicable because the officer was on extended leave at the time of the alleged crime, meaning they were neither acting within nor outside the exercise of their functions, nor could they have been territorially competent, thus precluding the application of the cited special jurisdiction rule.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

ARTICLE 687 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE PENALE; Inspector Murder Jurisdiction Dispute: An inspector charged with murder by an investigating judge was subject to a request for designation of jurisdiction based on a statute applicable to crimes committed by a judicial police officer within their territorial jurisdiction, whether in the exercise of their duties or not; however, the court rejected the request, reasoning that the statutory provisions are exhaustive and inapplicable because the officer was on extended leave at the time of the alleged crime, meaning they were neither acting within nor outside the exercise of their functions, nor could they have been territorially competent, thus precluding the application of the cited special jurisdiction rule.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
assassinat compétence territoriale agent de police juge d'instruction compétence de surveillance obligation légale

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
ARTICLE 687 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE PENALE
The request for designation of jurisdiction was rejected because the conditions of this article, which governs jurisdiction for acts committed by judicial police officers, were not met by the accused.
Généré par l'IA
75-92590
Jurisdictional Conflict in Murder Complicity Case
64-93258
Manager's Dual Role and Jurisdiction Transfer in Manslaughter Investigation
92-80922
Designation of Investigating Jurisdiction for Acts by Judicial Police Officer Outside Official Duties
79-93680
Appeal Regarding Jurisdiction Following Referral for Involuntary Manslaughter Involving a Mayor
99-84589
Murder Conviction Appeal Regarding Appointment of Police Officers as Experts

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
ARTICLE 687 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE PENALE

The request for designation of jurisdiction was rejected because the conditions of this article, which governs jurisdiction for acts committed by judicial police officers, were not met by the accused.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

LA COUR,

VU LADITE REQUETE ;

VU L'ARTICLE 687 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE PENALE ;

ATTENDU QUE LOUIS X..., INSPECTEUR DIVISIONNAIRE DE LA POLICE NATIONALE, OFFICIER DE POLICE JUDICIAIRE, A ETE INCULPE D'ASSASSINAT PAR LE JUGE D'INSTRUCTION AU TRIBUNAL DE GRANDE INSTANCE D'ORLEANS ;

MAIS ATTENDU QUE LES DISPOSITIONS DE L'ARTICLE 687 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE PENALE, MODIFIE PAR LA LOI DU 18 JUILLET 1974, SUSVISE, SONT LIMITATIVES ;

QUE LE TEXTE NE VISE QUE LES CRIMES ET DELITS COMMIS PAR UN OFFICIER DE POLICE JUDICIAIRE, COMMIS DANS LA CIRCONSCRIPTION OU IL EST TERRITORIALEMENT COMPETENT, HORS OU DANS L'EXERCICE DE SES FONCTIONS ;

ATTENDU QU'IL RESULTE DES RENSEIGNEMENTS FOURNIS PAR LE PROCUREUR DE LA REPUBLIQUE D'ORLEANS QUE, AU MOMENT DES FAITS, X..., ETANT EN CONGE DE LONGUE DUREE, N'EXERCAIT PAS SES FONCTIONS ;

QU'IL N'A AGI NI HORS NI DANS L'EXERCICE DE CELLES-CI ET QU'IL NE POUVAIT ETRE TERRITORIALEMENT COMPETENT ;

QUE LE TEXTE PRECITE NE LUI EST PAS APPLICABLE ;

QU'IL N'Y A LIEU, DES LORS, A DESIGNATION DE JURIDICTION ;

PAR CES MOTIFS :

REJETTE LA REQUETE.