Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
67-90869 Généré par l'IA

Opposition to Court of Cassation Ruling Inadmissible Due to Improper Filing Location

Numéro de cause 67-90869
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction France (FR)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Irrecevable (Inadmissible)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

An individual sought to file an opposition to a judgment issued by the Criminal Chamber of the Court of Cassation, which had overturned a prior Court of Appeal ruling that had dismissed charges against the individual for breach of trust. The Court of Cassation declared the opposition inadmissible because, pursuant to the relevant article of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the opposition must be filed with the registry of the jurisdiction that rendered the decision being challenged before the Court of Cassation, which in this case was the registry of the Metz detached chamber of the Court of Appeal of Colmar, and not the registry of the Court of Cassation itself; since the procedural formalities for opposition to a Court of Cassation ruling are a matter of public order and the appellant provided no justification for failing to adhere to the proper procedure, the declaration of opposition did not validly bring the matter before the court.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

ARTICLE 589 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE PENALE; Opposition to Court of Cassation Ruling Inadmissible Due to Improper Filing Location: The Court of Cassation declared the opposition inadmissible because, pursuant to the relevant article of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the opposition must be filed with the registry of the jurisdiction that rendered the decision being challenged before the Court of Cassation, which in this case was the registry of the Metz detached chamber of the Court of Appeal of Colmar, and not the registry of the Court of Cassation itself; since the procedural formalities for opposition to a Court of Cassation ruling are a matter of public order and the appellant provided no justification for failing to adhere to the proper procedure, the declaration of opposition did not validly bring the matter before the court.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
décisions incidentes trouble de l'ordre public motifs de cassation dossier pénal procédure d'opposition compétence en matière de trust

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
ARTICLE 589 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE PENALE
The opposition was deemed inadmissible because it was not filed with the competent registry as required by this article.
Généré par l'IA
09-83490
Opposition to Court of Cassation Decision Admissibility Ruling
07-88686
Inadmissibility of Opposition to Criminal Cassation Decision
90-84178
Inadmissibility of Opposition to Rejected Cassation Appeal
12-86611
Opposition to Cassation Rejection on Procedural Grounds
90-86611
Inadmissibility of Opposition to Cassation Chamber Decision on Jurisdiction Designation

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
ARTICLE 589 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE PENALE

The opposition was deemed inadmissible because it was not filed with the competent registry as required by this article.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

IRRECEVABILITE SUR L'OPPOSITION FORMEE PAR X... (JEAN, MARIE, FRANCOIS), A L'ARRET RENDU PAR LA CHAMBRE CRIMINELLE DE LA COUR DE CASSATION LE 23 MARS 1967 LA COUR, SUR LA RECEVABILITE DE L'OPPOSITION ;

ATTENDU QUE X... (JEAN-MARIE-FRANCOIS) A, PAR DECLARATION RECUE AU GREFFE DE LA COUR DE CASSATION LE 25 MARS 1967, FORME OPPOSITION A L'ARRET RENDU PAR LA CHAMBRE CRIMINELLE DE CETTE COUR LE 7 DECEMBRE 1966 ET PAR LEQUEL A ETE CASSE UN ARRET DE LA COUR D'APPEL DE COLMAR (CHAMBRE DETACHEE A METZ) DU 18 MARS 1965, RENVOYANT DES FINS DE LA POURSUITE LEDIT X..., PREVENU D'ABUS DE CONFIANCE ;

MAIS ATTENDU QU'AUX TERMES DE L'ARTICLE 589 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE PENALE, L'OPPOSITION DOIT ETRE FORMEE PAR DECLARATION AU GREFFE DE LA JURIDICTION AYANT RENDU LA DECISION DEFEREE A LA CENSURE DE LA COUR DE CASSATION ;

QU'EN L'ESPECE, LE GREFFE COMPETENT ETAIT CELUI DE LA COUR D'APPEL DE COLMAR (CHAMBRE DETACHEE A METZ) ;

QUE LES FORMES DE L'OPPOSITION A UN ARRET RENDU PAR LA COUR DE CASSATION ETANT D'ORDRE PUBLIC, ET X... NE JUSTIFIANT PAS, ET N'ALLEGUANT MEME PAS AVOIR ETE DANS L'IMPOSSIBILITE ABSOLUE DE SATISFAIRE AUX PRESCRIPTIONS DE L'ARTICLE 589 SUSVISE, SA DECLARATION D'OPPOSITION NE SAISIT PAS REGULIEREMENT LA COUR DE CASSATION ;

PAR CES MOTIFS : DIT LA DECLARATION D'OPPOSITION DE X... NON RECEVABLE PRESIDENT : M ZAMBEAUX - RAPPORTEUR : M GAGNE - AVOCAT GENERAL : M BOUCHERON