Appeal Forfeited for Failure to Comply with Procedural Deposit Requirements
France (FR)
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe applicant appealed a decision by the Court of Appeal affirming its jurisdiction to rule on the offense of failure to present a child; however, because the appeal was lodged solely against a ruling on jurisdiction, and the applicant failed to either deposit the required fine or produce the supplementary documents mandated by the relevant procedural code article, the Court found that the exception to the deposit requirement for those sentenced to imprisonment did not apply, as the appealed decision did not impose or render executory such a sentence, leading to the declaration that the appeal was forfeited.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAARTICLES 580 ET 581 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE PENALE, ARTICLE 581 SUSVISE DU CODE DE PROCEDURE PENALE; Appeal Forfeited for Failure to Comply with Procedural Deposit Requirements: The applicant appealed a decision by the Court of Appeal affirming its jurisdiction to rule on the offense of failure to present a child; however, because the appeal was lodged solely against a ruling on jurisdiction, and the applicant failed to either deposit the required fine or produce the supplementary documents mandated by the relevant procedural code article, the Court found that the exception to the deposit requirement for those sentenced to imprisonment did not apply, as the appealed decision did not impose or render executory such a sentence, leading to the declaration that the appeal was forfeited.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IADispositions légales citées
Généré par l'IADécisions connexes
Généré par l'IAQuestions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator
Généré par l'IACited as the applicable legal framework concerning the requirements for the appeal (consignation).
Cited in relation to the failure to produce the required supplementary documents.
Texte complet
DECHEANCE DU POURVOI DE X... (MOHAMED), CONTRE UN ARRET DE LA COUR D'APPEL DE PARIS, EN DATE DU 9 OCTOBRE 1969 PAR LEQUEL CELLE-CI S'EST DECLAREE COMPETENTE POUR JUGER LE DELIT DE NON-REPRESENTATION D'ENFANTS, QUI LUI EST REPROCHE ;
LA COUR, SUR LA CONSIGNATION DE L'AMENDE ;
VU LES ARTICLES 580 ET 581 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE PENALE ;
ATTENDU QUE LE DEMANDEUR S'EST POURVU CONTRE UN ARRET STATUANT SUR LA COMPETENCE ;
QU'IL N'A NI CONSIGNE L'AMENDE A L'APPUI DE SON POURVOI NI PRODUIT LES PIECES SUPPLETIVES PREVUES PAR L'ARTICLE 581 SUSVISE DU CODE DE PROCEDURE PENALE ;
ATTENDU QUE LA DISPENSE DE CONSIGNATION DE L'AMENDE ACCORDEE PAR LEDIT ARTICLE EN MATIERE CORRECTIONNELLE ET DE POLICE AUX INDIVIDUS CONDAMNES A L'EMPRISONNEMENT NE S'APPLIQUE QU'AU CAS OU LE POURVOI EST FORME CONTRE UNE DECISION, QUI A PRONONCE CETTE PEINE OU QUI A EU POUR EFFET DE LA RENDRE EXECUTOIRE ;
QUE TEL N'EST PAS LE CAS, EN L'ESPECE, ET QUE LE DEMANDEUR DOIT ETRE DECLARE DECHU DE SON POURVOI ;
DECLARE X... MOHAMED DECHU DE SON POURVOI.