Public Prosecutor v. Elected Official (Jurisdiction for Electoral Defamation)
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe case concerned a request by the public prosecutor to designate the competent jurisdiction for a matter involving alleged insults and defamation committed by an elected official, who was also a judicial police officer, within the district where he held territorial competence. The Court of Cassation rejected the request, reasoning that because the alleged offenses occurred during a cantonal election campaign with the intent to favor or combat a candidacy, they fell under the special provisions of the Electoral Code, which explicitly exclude the application of the general provisions concerning the designation of jurisdiction in the Code of Criminal Procedure for all offenses committed in view of elections, regardless of the nature of those offenses.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAARTICLE L 115 DU CODE ELECTORAL, ARTICLE 687 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE PENALE; Public Prosecutor v. Elected Official (Jurisdiction for Electoral Defamation): The Court of Cassation rejected the request, reasoning that because the alleged offenses occurred during a cantonal election campaign with the intent to favor or combat a candidacy, they fell under the special provisions of the Electoral Code, which explicitly exclude the application of the general provisions concerning the designation of jurisdiction in the Code of Criminal Procedure for all offenses committed in view of elections, regardless of the nature of those offenses.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IADispositions légales citées
Généré par l'IADécisions connexes
Généré par l'IAQuestions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe court applied this article to exclude the application of articles 679 to 688 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, as the offenses were committed during an electoral campaign.
This article was considered alongside Article L 115 of the Electoral Code, which excluded its application in this specific case.
Texte complet
REJET DE LA REQUETE DU PROCUREUR DE LA REPUBLIQUE PRES LE TRIBUNAL DE GRANDE INSTANCE DE SARREGUEMINES TENDANT A LA DESIGNATION DE LA JURIDICTION CHARGEE DE L'AFFAIRE SUIVIE CONTRE X... (ERIC), DU CHEF D'INJURES ET DIFFAMATION VU LADITE REQUETE;
VU LES DISPOSITIONS DE L'ARTICLE 687 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE PENALE, ENSEMBLE L'ARTICLE L 115 DU CODE ELECTORAL;
VU LA PLAINTE AVEC CONSTITUTION DE PARTIE CIVILE FORMULEE PAR Y... ANNA-MARIE DU 20 NOVEMBRE 1973;
ATTENDU QUE X... ERIC, SENATEUR MAIRE DE FORBACH, OFFICIER DE POLICE JUDICIAIRE, EST SUSCEPTIBLE D'ETRE INCULPE, DU CHEF D'INJURES ET DIFFAMATION, INFRACTIONS QUI AURAIENT ETE COMMISES DANS LA CIRCONSCRIPTION OU IL EST TERRITORIALEMENT COMPETENT, HORS OU DANS L'EXERCICE DE SES FONCTIONS;
MAIS ATTENDU QUE CES INFRACTIONS AURAIENT ETE COMMISES AU COURS DE LA CAMPAGNE ELECTORALE CONCERNANT LES ELECTIONS CANTONALES DE FORBACH, DANS LE BUT DE FAVORISER OU DE COMBATTRE UNE CANDIDATURE;
QUE L'ARTICLE L 115 DU CODE ELECTORAL, QUI EXCLUT TOUTE APPLICATION DES ARTICLES 679 A 688 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE PENALE, S'ETEND A TOUS LES DELITS COMMIS EN VUE DE FAVORISER OU DE COMBATTRE UNE CANDIDATURE, QUELLE QUE SOIT LA NATURE DE CES DELITS ET QUELS QU'AIENT ETE LES MOYENS A L'AIDE DESQUELS ILS SE SONT REALISES;
QUE LES FAITS DE L'ESPECE ENTRENT DANS LES PREVISIONS DE CE TEXTE;
DIT QU'IL N'Y A LIEU A DESIGNATION DE JURIDICTION