Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
69-91049 Généré par l'IA

Civil Party Opposition to Supreme Court Criminal Ruling Declared Inadmissible

Numéro de cause 69-91049
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction France (FR)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Irrecevable (Inadmissible)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The civil party sought to file an opposition against a Supreme Court criminal chamber ruling dated January 7, 1969, which had declared their appeal against a lower court's decision inadmissible due to failure to make the required deposit; the Court ruled the opposition inadmissible because the applicable procedural code provisions allow opposition to Supreme Court criminal rulings only for a party who did not receive notification of the appeal or copies of the supporting briefs, and in this instance, the opposing party was the same individual whose initial appeal had resulted in the decision being contested, rendering them ineligible to oppose their own prior procedural setback.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

article 579 du Code de procédure pénale, article 589 du Code de procédure pénale; Civil Party Opposition to Supreme Court Criminal Ruling Declared Inadmissible: The civil party sought to file an opposition against a Supreme Court criminal chamber ruling dated January 7, 1969, which had declared their appeal against a lower court's decision inadmissible due to failure to make the required deposit; the Court ruled the opposition inadmissible because the applicable procedural code provisions allow opposition to Supreme Court criminal rulings only for a party who did not receive notification of the appeal or copies of the supporting briefs, and in this instance, the opposing party was the same individual whose initial appeal had resulted in the decision being contested, rendering them ineligible to oppose their own prior procedural setback.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
exception d'inconstitutionnalité violation des droits de partie opposition politique conseil de la partie adverse notification de la décision éligibilité

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
article 579 du Code de procédure pénale
This article (along with Article 589) defines the conditions under which an opposition to a decision of the Criminal Chamber of the Court of Cassation is provided, conditions which the opponent in this case failed to meet.
article 589 du Code de procédure pénale
This article (along with Article 579) defines the conditions under which an opposition to a decision of the Criminal Chamber of the Court of Cassation is provided, conditions which the opponent in this case failed to meet.
Généré par l'IA
95-81518
Civil Party Appeal on Indictment Chamber Decision Deemed Inadmissible
05-81212
Accused's Appeal Against Referral and Civil Party Constitution Ruling Admissible
95-83591
Civil Party Appeal Dismissed for Insufficient Justification
92-83253
Civil Party Appeal on Indictment Decision Inadmissible
96-83911
Civil Party Appeal on Indictment Chamber Decision Inadmissible

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
article 579 du Code de procédure pénale

This article (along with Article 589) defines the conditions under which an opposition to a decision of the Criminal Chamber of the Court of Cassation is provided, conditions which the opponent in this case failed to meet.

article 589 du Code de procédure pénale

This article (along with Article 579) defines the conditions under which an opposition to a decision of the Criminal Chamber of the Court of Cassation is provided, conditions which the opponent in this case failed to meet.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

IRRECEVABILITE DE L'OPPOSITION FORMEE PAR X... (ALBERT), PARTIE CIVILE, CONTRE UN ARRET DE LA CHAMBRE CRIMINELLE DE LA COUR DE CASSATION, EN DATE DU 7 JANVIER 1969 QUI L'A DECLARE DECHU, FAUTE DE CONSIGNATION, DE SON POURVOI CONTRE UN ARRET DE LA CHAMBRE D'ACCUSATION DE LA COUR D'APPEL DE CAEN DU 11 DECEMBRE 1968, DECLARANT IRRECEVABLE L'APPEL PAR LUI FAIT D'UNE ORDONNANCE DE REFUS D'INFORMER DANS LES POURSUITES EXERCEES CONTRE X POUR ABUS DE BLANC-SEING, VOL ET USAGE DE FAUX LA COUR, VU LA REQUETE DU DEMANDEUR EN DATE DU 27 MARS 1969;

ATTENDU QUE LA PROCEDURE D'OPPOSITION AUX ARRETS RENDUS PAR LA CHAMBRE CRIMINELLE DE LA COUR DE CASSATION, N'EST PREVUE, AUX TERMES DES ARTICLES 579 ET 589 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE PENALE QU'AU BENEFICE DE LA PARTIE QUI N'A PAS RECU NOTIFICATION DU POURVOI, FORME PAR LE DEMANDEUR EN CASSATION OU QUI N'A PAS RECU COPIE DES MEMOIRES DEPOSES A L'APPUI DU POURVOI;

QU'IL SUIT DE LA QUE X... LUI-MEME DEMANDEUR EN CASSATION ET DONT LE POURVOI A FAIT L'OBJET D'UN ARRET DE DECHEANCE, PRONONCE LE 7 JANVIER 1969, NE SAURAIT ETRE ADMIS A FAIRE OPPOSITION AUDIT ARRET;

PAR CES MOTIFS : DECLARE L'OPPOSITION NON RECEVABLE PRESIDENT : M COMTE - RAPPORTEUR : M HAUSS - AVOCAT GENERAL : M BOUCHERON.