Appeal Dismissed Regarding Fine for Irregular Course Opening
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe appeal was dismissed against a decision by the appellate court which had fined the appellant an amount with a suspended sentence for the irregular opening of a private technical course. The high court rejected the appeal because the appellant's brief, while citing procedural articles and alleging lack of reasoning, merely criticized the ruling without presenting a specific legal grievance for review, while the lower court's findings were sufficiently clear to allow the high court to verify the legality of the conviction, rendering the challenged decision formally regular.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAARTICLE 593 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE PENALE; Appeal Dismissed Regarding Fine for Irregular Course Opening: The high court rejected the appeal because the appellant's brief, while citing procedural articles and alleging lack of reasoning, merely criticized the ruling without presenting a specific legal grievance for review, while the lower court's findings were sufficiently clear to allow the high court to verify the legality of the conviction, rendering the challenged decision formally regular.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IADispositions légales citées
Généré par l'IADécisions connexes
Généré par l'IAQuestions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator
Généré par l'IAThis article was cited in the submitted brief, although the brief was ultimately rejected for failing to state a precise ground for appeal.
Texte complet
REJET DU POURVOI DE X... (ODILE), EPOUSE Y..., CONTRE UN ARRET DE LA COUR D'APPEL DE RIOM DU 5 FEVRIER 1964 QUI, POUR OUVERTURE IRREGULIERE D'UN COURS DE TECHNIQUE PRIVE, L'A CONDAMNE A 200 F D'AMENDE AVEC SURSIS LA COUR, VU LE MEMOIRE PRODUIT PAR LA DEMANDERESSE;
ATTENDU QUE S'IL VISE L'ARTICLE 593 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE PENALE ET S'IL INVOQUE UNE ABSENCE OU UNE INSUFFISANCE DE MOTIFS, LEDIT MEMOIRE, QUI SE BORNE A CRITIQUER L'ARRET ATTAQUE SANS FORMULER DE GRIEF PRECIS, N'OFFRE A JUGER AUCUN POINT DE DROIT, QUE D'AILLEURS LES ENONCIATIONS DES JUGES DU FOND PERMETTENT A LA COUR DE CASSATION D'EXERCER SON CONTROLE SUR LA LEGALITE DE LA CONDAMNATION PRONONCEE;
ET ATTENDU QUE L'ARRET EST REGULIER EN LA FORME;
REJETTE LE POURVOI PRESIDENT : M ZAMBEAUX - RAPPORTEUR : M POMPEI - AVOCAT GENERAL : M RELIQUET