Creditor Lacks Standing to Oppose Composition Agreement After Claim Dismissal
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAAn appellate court properly declared inadmissible a creditor's opposition to the approval of a debtor's composition agreement, based on the creditor's lack of interest, because a separate ruling on the same date had already dismissed the creditor's claim seeking reinstatement to file a claim during the judicial settlement proceedings of the debtor, and since the ruling dismissing the creditor's filing attempt was upheld by the highest court, the related ground of appeal challenging the admissibility of the opposition was deemed unfounded, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IACreditor Lacks Standing to Oppose Composition Agreement After Claim Dismissal: An appellate court properly declared inadmissible a creditor's opposition to the approval of a debtor's composition agreement, based on the creditor's lack of interest, because a separate ruling on the same date had already dismissed the creditor's claim seeking reinstatement to file a claim during the judicial settlement proceedings of the debtor, and since the ruling dismissing the creditor's filing attempt was upheld by the highest court, the related ground of appeal challenging the admissibility of the opposition was deemed unfounded, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IADécisions connexes
Généré par l'IATexte complet
SUR LE MOYEN UNIQUE : ATTENDU QUE L'ARRET ATTAQUE (RENNES, 10 JUIN 1981) A DECLARE IRRECEVABLE, FAUTE D'INTERET, L'OPPOSITION FORMEE PAR LA SOCIETE SPIE CAPAG A UN JUGEMENT HOMOLOGANT LE CONCORDAT VOTE PAR LES CREANCIERS DE LA SOCIETE KEROUAULT, AU MOTIF QU'UN ARRET RENDU A LA MEME DATE AVAIT DEBOUTE LA SOCIETE SPIE CAPAG DE LA DEMANDE EN RELEVE DE FORCLUSION QU'ELLE AVAIT PRESENTEE AFIN DE POUVOIR PRODUIRE AU PASSIF DU REGLEMENT JUDICIAIRE DE LA SOCIETE KEROUAULT ;
ATTENDU QUE LA CASSATION DE L'ARRET CITE EN PREMIER LIEU EST DEMANDEE PAR VOIE DE CONSEQUENCE DE LA CASSATION DE L'ARRET CITE EN SECOND LIEU ;
MAIS ATTENDU QUE LE POURVOI N 81-15 166 FORME CONTRE CETTE DERNIERE DECISION A ETE REJETE PAR UN ARRET DE CE JOUR DE LA CHAMBRE COMMERCIALE ET FINANCIERE DE LA COUR DE CASSATION ;
D'OU IL SUIT QUE LE MOYEN EST DEPOURVU DE FONDEMENT ;
PAR CES MOTIFS : REJETTE LE POURVOI FORME CONTRE L'ARRET RENDU, LE 10 JUIN 1981, SOUS LE N 301 PAR LA COUR D'APPEL DE RENNES ;