Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
78-91385 Généré par l'IA

Jurisdiction Designation for Former Public Official's Alleged Fraud and Forgery

Numéro de cause 78-91385
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction France (FR)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A former public official, potentially facing charges including complicity in fraud and forgery in public writing, was the subject of a jurisdiction designation request; the Court determined that the relevant procedural article for jurisdiction determination was $\S 679$ of the Code of Criminal Procedure, not $\S 681$, because the alleged offenses, even if established, were not committed while exercising the official's current functions, leading the Court to designate the investigating judge of the Paris tribunal de grande instance to hear the case.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

ARTICLE 681 NOUVEAU DU CODE DE PROCEDURE PENALE, L'ARTICLE 679 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE PENALE; Jurisdiction Designation for Former Public Official's Alleged Fraud and Forgery: A former public official, potentially facing charges including complicity in fraud and forgery in public writing, was the subject of a jurisdiction designation request; the Court determined that the relevant procedural article for jurisdiction determination was $\S 679$ of the Code of Criminal Procedure, not $\S 681$, because the alleged offenses, even if established, were not committed while exercising the official's current functions, leading the Court to designate the investigating judge of the Paris tribunal de grande instance to hear the case.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
code de procédure pénale prévention d'escroquerie escroquerie fonctionnaire public fixation de compétence cas d'exclusion

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
ARTICLE 681 NOUVEAU DU CODE DE PROCEDURE PENALE
This provision was initially noted in relation to the case but was explicitly excluded from application in favor of Art. 679.
L'ARTICLE 679 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE PENALE
This article must be applied for determining jurisdiction over the alleged offenses.
Généré par l'IA
90-82334
Appeal Regarding Jurisdiction Transfer in Fraud Case Involving Public Official
86-91071
Jurisdiction Designation Quashing Investigation Against Police Inspector for Embezzlement and Fraud
92-85415
Case Involving Forgery, Corruption, and Annulment of Civil Party Standing
05-80938
Complicity in Aggravated Forgery and Assize Court Jurisdiction
98-80734
Forgery in Public Document Involving Fraudulent Land Cession and Payment Collection

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
ARTICLE 681 NOUVEAU DU CODE DE PROCEDURE PENALE

This provision was initially noted in relation to the case but was explicitly excluded from application in favor of Art. 679.

L'ARTICLE 679 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE PENALE

This article must be applied for determining jurisdiction over the alleged offenses.

DESIGNE LE JUGE D'INSTRUCTION DU TRIBUNAL DE GRANDE INSTANCE DE PARIS POUR CONNAITRE DES FAITS DE LA POURSUITE.

This is the operative part of the final order, designating the competent jurisdiction.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

LA COUR,

VU LADITE REQUETE ;

VU LES DISPOSITIONS DE L'ARTICLE 681 NOUVEAU DU CODE DE PROCEDURE PENALE ;

ATTENDU QUE FRANCIS X..., QUI EXERCAIT AU MOMENT DES FAITS LES FONCTIONS DE SOUS-PREFET D'ARGENTEUIL, EST SUSCEPTIBLE D'ETRE INCULPE DE COMPLICITE D'ESCROQUERIE, FAUX EN ECRITURE PUBLIQUE COMMIS PAR UN FONCTIONNAIRE PUBLIC ET USAGE ;

ATTENDU QUE L'ARTICLE 679 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE PENALE DOIT RECEVOIR APPLICATION, A L'EXCLUSION DE L'ARTICLE 681 DU MEME CODE, DES LORS QUE LES INFRACTIONS, A LES SUPPOSER ETABLIES, N'ONT PAS ETE COMMISES DANS L'EXERCICE DES FONCTIONS ACTUELLEMENT EXERCEES ;

PAR CES MOTIFS :

DESIGNE LE JUGE D'INSTRUCTION DU TRIBUNAL DE GRANDE INSTANCE DE PARIS POUR CONNAITRE DES FAITS DE LA POURSUITE.