Appeal Inadmissibility Due to Untimely Filing After Initial Notification
France (FR)
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe Court of Cassation declared the appeal inadmissible because it was filed on February 20, 1989, against a decision initially notified on May 9, 1988, and subsequently served on January 10, 1989; the reasoning was that a service of process occurring after the deadline for appeal, which had already commenced upon the first notification, could not restart the statutory period for filing the appeal, thereby rendering the later-filed appeal untimely under the relevant civil procedure article.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAarticle 612 du nouveau Code de procédure civile; Appeal Inadmissibility Due to Untimely Filing After Initial Notification: The Court of Cassation declared the appeal inadmissible because it was filed on February 20, 1989, against a decision initially notified on May 9, 1988, and subsequently served on January 10, 1989; the reasoning was that a service of process occurring after the deadline for appeal, which had already commenced upon the first notification, could not restart the statutory period for filing the appeal, thereby rendering the later-filed appeal untimely under the relevant civil procedure article.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IADispositions légales citées
Généré par l'IADécisions connexes
Généré par l'IAQuestions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator
Généré par l'IACited in relation to the inadmissibility of the appeal based on the timing of the notification and service.
Texte complet
Sur la recevabilité du pourvoi :
Vu l'article 612 du nouveau Code de procédure civile ;
Attendu que le pourvoi a été formé le 20 février 1989 contre une décision notifiée le 9 mai 1988 et signifiée le 10 janvier 1989 ;
Attendu que la signification faite après l'expiration du délai pour former un pourvoi ouvert par une première notification n'a pu faire courir un nouveau délai ; d'où il suit que le pourvoi n'est pas recevable ;
PAR CES MOTIFS :
DECLARE IRRECEVABLE le pourvoi