Judicial Expert Fee Taxation Appeal Jurisdiction
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe court overturned a decision by the First President of a Court of Appeal concerning the taxation of judicial expert fees, because the relevant articles of the Code of Civil Procedure establish that only an order setting fees issued by the President of a court of first instance is subject to an appeal before the First President of the Court of Appeal; since the challenged order was issued by the First President of the Court of Appeal itself, ruling on an appeal against a fee-setting order from the same court's taxing authority, the First President improperly exercised jurisdiction, violating the governing procedural statutes.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAARTICLES 714 ET 724 DU NOUVEAU CODE DE PROCEDURE CIVILE, ARTICLE 1015 DU NOUVEAU CODE DE PROCEDURE CIVILE; Judicial Expert Fee Taxation Appeal Jurisdiction: The court overturned a decision by the First President of a Court of Appeal concerning the taxation of judicial expert fees, because the relevant articles of the Code of Civil Procedure establish that only an order setting fees issued by the President of a court of first instance is subject to an appeal before the First President of the Court of Appeal; since the challenged order was issued by the First President of the Court of Appeal itself, ruling on an appeal against a fee-setting order from the same court's taxing authority, the First President improperly exercised jurisdiction, violating the governing procedural statutes.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IADispositions légales citées
Généré par l'IADécisions connexes
Généré par l'IAQuestions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe court explicitly cites these articles as the basis for cassating the appealed order, as the order was not appealable under these provisions.
This procedural rule was followed before the court ruled on the stated ground for cassation.
Texte complet
SUR LE MOYEN, RELEVE D'OFFICE, APRES ACCOMPLISSEMENT DES FORMALITES PREVUES A L'ARTICLE 1015 DU NOUVEAU CODE DE PROCEDURE CIVILE : VU LES ARTICLES 714 ET 724 DU NOUVEAU CODE DE PROCEDURE CIVILE ;
ATTENDU QU'IL RESULTE DE CES TEXTES QUE SEULE L'ORDONNANCE DE TAXE RENDUE PAR LE PRESIDENT D'UNE JURIDICTION DE PREMIERE INSTANCE PEUT ETRE FRAPPEE D'UN RECOURS DEVANT LE PREMIER PRESIDENT DE LA COUR D'APPEL ;
ATTENDU QUE L'ORDONNANCE ATTAQUEE, RENDUE PAR LE PREMIER PRESIDENT D'UNE COUR D'APPEL A STATUE SUR LE RECOURS FORME PAR LA SOCIETE ANONYME DE CONSTRUCTION IMMOBILIERE PELEGRIN ET COMPAGNIE CONTRE UNE ORDONNANCE DU MAGISTRAT TAXATEUR DE CETTE MEME COUR D'APPEL QUI AVAIT TAXE LES HONORAIRES DE M CLAUDE Y..., EXPERT JUDICIAIREMENT X... ;
EN QUOI, LE PREMIER PRESIDENT A VIOLE LES TEXTES SUSVISES ;
PAR CES MOTIFS : CASSE ET ANNULE, SANS RENVOI, L'ORDONNANCE D'OPPOSITION A TAXE RENDUE LE 24 AVRIL 1981 PAR LE PREMIER PRESIDENT DE LA COUR D'APPEL D'AIX EN PROVENCE.