Social Security Fund v. Pension Representative Regarding Overpaid Pension Installment
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAFollowing the death of a pensioner, a regional social security fund sought repayment from the deceased's representative of the quarterly pension installment that became due after the date of death, leading the first instance commission to limit the representative's liability to the portion of the installment received after the death, which the higher court overturned because the pension, paid in arrears, was entirely subject to repayment, the representative's expenses incurred were irrelevant to the improperly received payments, and only the fund possessed the authority to grant a remission of debt.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAARTICLES L 68 ET L 359 DU CODE DE LA SECURITE SOCIALE, ARTICLES 1235 ET 2003 DU CODE CIVIL; Social Security Fund v. Pension Representative Regarding Overpaid Pension Installment: Following the death of a pensioner, a regional social security fund sought repayment from the deceased's representative of the quarterly pension installment that became due after the date of death, leading the first instance commission to limit the representative's liability to the portion of the installment received after the death, which the higher court overturned because the pension, paid in arrears, was entirely subject to repayment, the representative's expenses incurred were irrelevant to the improperly received payments, and only the fund possessed the authority to grant a remission of debt.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IADispositions légales citées
Généré par l'IADécisions connexes
Généré par l'IAQuestions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator
Généré par l'IAThese articles, along with others, formed the legal basis for the decision rendered by the Supreme Court.
These articles, along with others, formed the legal basis for the decision rendered by the Supreme Court.
Texte complet
SUR LE MOYEN UNIQUE : VU LES ARTICLES L 68 ET L 359 DU CODE DE LA SECURITE SOCIALE ET LES ARTICLES 1235 ET 2003 DU CODE CIVIL ;
ATTENDU QU'A LA SUITE DU DECES, SURVENU LE 27 JUIN 1977, DE M PIERRE X... A QUI ELLE SERVAIT UNE PENSION DE VIEILLESSE, LA CAISSE REGIONALE D'ASSURANCE-MALADIE DU SUD-EST A RECLAME LE REMBOURSEMENT DES ARRERAGES VENUS A ECHEANCE LE 1ER AOUT 1977 A MME Y..., MANDATAIRE MAIS NON HERITIERE DU DEFUNT ;
QUE CETTE PERSONNE AYANT FAIT VALOIR QU'EN TANT QUE MANDATAIRE ELLE AVAIT ENGAGE DES FRAIS A L'OCCASION DE CE DECES, LA COMMISSION DE PREMIERE INSTANCE A LIMITE LA DETTE DE MME Y... A LA PORTION DES ARRERAGES POSTERIEURE AU DECES ;
QU'EN STATUANT AINSI, ALORS QUE LA PENSION PAYABLE TRIMESTRIELLEMENT A TERME ECHU ETAIT INTEGRALEMENT SUJETTE A REPETITION, QUE LES FRAIS ENGAGES PAR MME Y... ETAIENT SANS RAPPORT AVEC LES ARRERAGES INDUMENT PERCUS ET QUE SEULE LA CAISSE AVAIT QUALITE POUR ACCORDER UNE REMISE DE DETTE, LA COMMISSION DE PREMIERE INSTANCE A VIOLE LES TEXTES SUSVISES ;
PAR CES MOTIFS : CASSE ET ANNULE LA DECISION RENDUE ENTRE LES PARTIES LE 7 OCTOBRE 1981 PAR LA COMMISSION DE PREMIERE INSTANCE DU VAR ;
REMET, EN CONSEQUENCE, LA CAUSE ET LES PARTIES AU MEME ET SEMBLABLE ETAT OU ELLES ETAIENT AVANT LADITE DECISION ET, POUR ETRE FAIT DROIT, LES RENVOIE DEVANT LA COMMISSION DE PREMIERE INSTANCE DES ALPES-MARITIMES.