Appeal Inadmissible Due to Late Filing in Receiver Liability Case
France (FR)
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe appeal filed against a ruling of the Court of Appeal that established the personal faults of an individual during their mission as the receiver of a company undergoing judicial settlement and subsequent liquidation was deemed inadmissible due to tardiness. The appellant claimed the ruling was never personally served, arguing that the service performed on December 8, 1980, was addressed to them in their capacity as the liquidator of the company's assets, a role distinct from their personal liability. However, the court reasoned that because the service document identified the individual specifically as the "receiver of the liquidation of the assets of the company" and the appellate ruling explicitly mentioned personal faults, the appellant could not reasonably have doubted that the service was intended for them in their personal capacity, thus rendering the appeal untimely.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAIRRECEVABLE LE POURVOI; Appeal Inadmissible Due to Late Filing in Receiver Liability Case: The appellant claimed the ruling was never personally served, arguing that the service performed on December 8, 1980, was addressed to them in their capacity as the liquidator of the company's assets, a role distinct from their personal liability. However, the court reasoned that because the service document identified the individual specifically as the "receiver of the liquidation of the assets of the company" and the appellate ruling explicitly mentioned personal faults, the appellant could not reasonably have doubted that the service was intended for them in their personal capacity, thus rendering the appeal untimely.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IADispositions légales citées
Généré par l'IADécisions connexes
Généré par l'IAQuestions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe court declared the appeal inadmissible because it was filed late.
Texte complet
SUR LA RECEVABILITE DU POURVOI : ATTENDU QUE BLIN S'EST POURVU EN CASSATION LE 30 JUILLET 1981 CONTRE UN ARRET (BOURGES) RENDU LE 11 JUIN 1980 QUI, RECEVANT LA SOCIETE A RESPONSABILITE LIMITEE ETABLISSEMENTS DE DECOLLETAGE DE NEVERS (LA SOCIETE EDN) ET SON GERANT MASSON EN LEUR APPEL, A DIT QU'ETAIENT ETABLIES LES FAUTES PERSONNELLES DE BLIN AU COURS DE SA MISSION DE SYNDIC DU REGLEMENT JUDICIAIRE ULTERIEUREMENT CONVERTI EN LIQUIDATION DES BIENS DE LA SOCIETE EDN ;
ATTENDU QU'A L'APPUI DE LA RECEVABILITE DE SON POURVOI, BLIN PRETEND QUE CET ARRET NE LUI A JAMAIS ETE SIGNIFIE A TITRE PERSONNEL, QUE LA SIGNIFICATION INTERVENUE LE 8 DECEMBRE 1980 A ETE DELIVREE A BLIN, SYNDIC DE LA LIQUIDATION DES BIENS DE LA SOCIETE EDN ET QUE CE DERNIER EST UN TIERS PAR RAPPORT A BLIN, PRIS A TITRE UNIQUEMENT PERSONNEL ;
MAIS ATTENDU QUE L'ACTE DE SIGNIFICATION N'A PAS ETE DELIVRE A BLIN EN SA QUALITE DE SYNDIC DE LADITE PROCEDURE COLLECTIVE, NI SIMPLEMENT A BLIN ES QUALITES, MAIS L'A ETE A BLIN SYNDIC DE LA LIQUIDATION DES BIENS DE LA SOCIETE EDN ET QU'EN RAISON DES ENONCIATIONS DE L'ARRET, BLIN N'A PU DOUTER QUE CELUI-CI LUI ETAIT SIGNIFIE A TITRE PERSONNEL ;
D'OU IL SUIT QUE SON POURVOI EST IRRECEVABLE COMME TARDIF ;
PAR CES MOTIFS : DECLARE IRRECEVABLE LE POURVOI FORME CONTRE L'ARRET RENDU LE 11 JUIN 1980 PAR LA COUR D'APPEL DE BOURGES ;