Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
80-40058 Généré par l'IA

Maternity Leave Indemnity Following Sick Leave Entitlement Appeal

Numéro de cause 80-40058
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction France (FR)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

An employer appealed a decision requiring payment of two additional weeks of maternity leave indemnity, as stipulated by a collective bargaining agreement, to a former manual laborer whose initial 14-week maternity leave was followed by sick leave rather than an extension of maternity leave. The reviewing court rejected the appeal, holding that the collective agreement's provision for the supplementary indemnity applied even if the employee was on sick leave immediately following the normal maternity leave period, meaning the employee was entitled to the benefit without needing to formally extend her maternity leave.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

ARTICLES 1134 DU CODE CIVIL, ART. 1134 DU CODE CIVIL, 9 DE LA CONVENTION COLLECTIVE DE LA SALAISON, 455 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE CIVILE, REJETTE LE POURVOI; Maternity Leave Indemnity Following Sick Leave Entitlement Appeal: The reviewing court rejected the appeal, holding that the collective agreement's provision for the supplementary indemnity applied even if the employee was on sick leave immediately following the normal maternity leave period, meaning the employee was entitled to the benefit without needing to formally extend her maternity leave.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
congé de maternité décision d'extension droit aux prestations complémentaires indemnités journalières de maladie délai de contrôle prolongation du temps de travail

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
ARTICLES 1134 DU CODE CIVIL
codecivil
ART. 1134 DU CODE CIVIL
This article, cited in the sole ground of appeal, was considered in the reasoning for rejecting the appeal, confirming the interpretation of the collective agreement.
9 DE LA CONVENTION COLLECTIVE DE LA SALAISON
This article was cited in the sole ground of appeal and interpreted by the Court to justify the decision in favor of the employee.
455 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE CIVILE
This procedural rule was cited in the ground of appeal concerning the lack of reasons, which the Court implicitly rejected by upholding the decision.
REJETTE LE POURVOI
This is the operative part of the final order, formally rejecting the appeal.
Généré par l'IA
04-42896
Employee Absence Entitlement Under Collective Agreement
91-42997
Maternity Leave and Untaken Paid Leave Compensation upon Contract Termination
86-40863
Employee Vacation Pay Indemnity During Maternity Leave
91-45607
Employer Appeal Regarding Sick Leave Waiting Period and Collective Bargaining Agreement
89-44676
Employee Dismissal During Pregnancy Leave: Bonus Calculation and Damages Appeal

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
ART. 1134 DU CODE CIVIL

This article, cited in the sole ground of appeal, was considered in the reasoning for rejecting the appeal, confirming the interpretation of the collective agreement.

9 DE LA CONVENTION COLLECTIVE DE LA SALAISON

This article was cited in the sole ground of appeal and interpreted by the Court to justify the decision in favor of the employee.

455 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE CIVILE

This procedural rule was cited in the ground of appeal concerning the lack of reasons, which the Court implicitly rejected by upholding the decision.

REJETTE LE POURVOI

This is the operative part of the final order, formally rejecting the appeal.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

SUR LE MOYEN UNIQUE, PRIS DE LA VIOLATION DES ARTICLES 1134 DU CODE CIVIL, 9 DE LA CONVENTION COLLECTIVE DE LA SALAISON, 455 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE CIVILE, DEFAUT DE MOTIFS, MANQUE DE BASE LEGALE : ATTENDU QUE LA SOCIETE OLIDA FAIT GRIEF AU JUGEMENT ATTAQUE D'AVOIR DECIDE QUE DAME X..., QUI, A SON SERVICE EN QUALITE DE MANUTENTIONNAIRE, AVAIT BENEFICIE D'UN CONGE DE MATERNITE DE 14 SEMAINES DU 16 DECEMBRE 1974 AU 22 MARS 1975, DEVAIT PERCEVOIR UNE INDEMNITE CORRESPONDANT AUX 2 SEMAINES SUPPLEMENTAIRES PREVUES A L'ARTICLE 9 DE LA CONVENTION COLLECTIVE DE LA SALAISON, SANS REPONDRE A SES CONCLUSIONS FAISANT VALOIR QUE, POUR POUVOIR BENEFICIER DE CET AVANTAGE, LA FEMME DEVAIT DEMEURER EN CONGE DE MATERNITE A L'ISSUE DU CONGE LEGAL, CE QUI N'AVAIT PAS ETE LE CAS DE L'INTERESSEE QUI S'ETAIT MISE ALORS EN CONGE DE MALADIE ;

MAIS ATTENDU QU'IL RESULTE DE L'ARTICLE 9 DE LA CONVENTION COLLECTIVE QUE, SI LA FEMME SE TROUVE EN ARRET DE TRAVAIL POUR MALADIE A L'ISSUE DU CONGE NORMAL DE MATERNITE, ELLE PEUT NEANMOINS BENEFICIER DE L'INDEMNITE CORRESPONDANT AU CONGE SUPPLEMENTAIRE PREVU PAR CE TEXTE SANS AVOIR A ACCOMPLIR DE DILIGENCES PARTICULIERES POUR PROLONGER SON CONGE DE MATERNITE ;

D'OU IL SUIT QUE - LE CONSEIL DE PRUD'HOMMES A, SANS ENCOURIR LES REPROCHES DU MOYEN, LEGALEMENT JUSTIFIE SA DECISION ;

PAR CES MOTIFS : REJETTE LE POURVOI FORME CONTRE LE JUGEMENT RENDU LE 19 JUIN 1979 PAR LE CONSEIL DE PRUD'HOMMES D'AIX-EN-PROVENCE ;