Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
81-15586 Généré par l'IA

Divorce Power of Attorney Nullity Appeal Dismissed

Numéro de cause 81-15586
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction France (FR)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

An appellant, seeking the annulment of a prior decision related to divorce proceedings, contended that the lower court erred by refusing to nullify the opposing party's power of attorney due to a false domicile declaration, arguing this violated a specific procedural article; however, the Court of Cassation upheld the lower court's decision, reasoning that the cited article mandates subsequent conclusions be deemed inadmissible only if required information is not provided, and explicitly stated that the relevant procedural article does not impose nullity as a sanction for errors in drafting the power of attorney.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

ARTICLE 961 DU NOUVEAU CODE DE PROCEDURE CIVILE, ARTICLE 960 DU NOUVEAU CODE DE PROCEDURE CIVILE; Divorce Power of Attorney Nullity Appeal Dismissed: An appellant, seeking the annulment of a prior decision related to divorce proceedings, contended that the lower court erred by refusing to nullify the opposing party's power of attorney due to a false domicile declaration, arguing this violated a specific procedural article; however, the Court of Cassation upheld the lower court's decision, reasoning that the cited article mandates subsequent conclusions be deemed inadmissible only if required information is not provided, and explicitly stated that the relevant procedural article does not impose nullity as a sanction for errors in drafting the power of attorney.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
procédure en annulation constatation de nullité procuration pouvoir de décision procédures connexes unité du jugement de divorce

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
ARTICLE 961 DU NOUVEAU CODE DE PROCEDURE CIVILE
This article is cited to show that the alleged defect (error in the appointment of the proctor) is not sanctioned by nullity as argued in the sole ground of appeal.
ARTICLE 960 DU NOUVEAU CODE DE PROCEDURE CIVILE
The appellate court's interpretation of this article, which the appellant claimed was violated, was confirmed as correct by stating it does not sanction nullity for errors in drafting the proctor's appointment.
Généré par l'IA
79-14017
Appeal Nullity Based on Prejudicial Prior Conduct
02-44957
Association Nullification Request Rejected Due to Dismissed Appeal
69-11200
Appeal of Divorce Decree Affirmed Despite Nullity Claim
JURITEXT000006960260
Nullity of Divorce Appeal Judgment Due to Public Hearing Violation
01-16457
Appeal Nullified Due to Erroneous Procedural Notification

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
ARTICLE 961 DU NOUVEAU CODE DE PROCEDURE CIVILE

This article is cited to show that the alleged defect (error in the appointment of the proctor) is not sanctioned by nullity as argued in the sole ground of appeal.

ARTICLE 960 DU NOUVEAU CODE DE PROCEDURE CIVILE

The appellate court's interpretation of this article, which the appellant claimed was violated, was confirmed as correct by stating it does not sanction nullity for errors in drafting the proctor's appointment.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

SUR LE MOYEN UNIQUE : ATTENDU QUE DAME E. X... A L'ARRET ATTAQUE, QUI L'A DEBOUTEE D'UN RECOURS EN REVISION FORME CONTRE UN PRECEDENT ARRET STATUANT SUR UN INCIDENT DE LA PROCEDURE DE DIVORCE QUI L'OPPOSAIT A SON MARI, D'AVOIR, PAR VIOLATION DE L'ARTICLE 960 DU NOUVEAU CODE DE PROCEDURE CIVILE, REFUSE DE PRONONCER LA NULLITE DE LA CONSTITUTION D'AVOUE DE CELUI-CI, ALORS QU'IL RESULTAIT DE SES CONSTATATIONS QUE LA PREMIERE DOMICILIATION INDIQUEE ETAIT FAUSSE ;

MAIS ATTENDU QUE L'ARTICLE 961 DU NOUVEAU CODE DE PROCEDURE CIVILE DISPOSE SEULEMENT QUE LES CONCLUSIONS PRISES ULTERIEUREMENT NE SONT PAS RECEVABLES TANT QUE LES INDICATIONS MENTIONNEES A L'ARTICLE 2 DE L'ARTICLE PRECEDENT N'ONT PAS ETE FOURNIES ;

ET ATTENDU QUE LA COUR D'APPEL ENONCE EXACTEMENT QUE LEDIT ARTICLE 960 NE SANCTIONNE PAS PAR LA NULLITE LES ERREURS COM COMMISES DANS LA REDACTION DE LA CONSTITUTION D'AVOUE ;

D'OU IL SUIT QUE LE MOYEN NE SAURAIT ETRE ACCUEILLI ;

PAR CES MOTIFS : REJETTE LE POURVOI FORME CONTRE L'ARRET RENDU LE 7 JUILLET 1981, PAR LA COUR D'APPEL DE PARIS ;