Husband's Appeal on Child Support Conditioned on Adult Children's Residence Rejected
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAA husband appealed a decision that required him to pay child support for his three adult children, arguing the appellate court failed to address his claim regarding his right to supervise their studies, which he conditioned on them living with him. The court rejected the appeal, reasoning that while the appellate court noted the husband's willingness to contribute to the adult children's maintenance based on his means, it correctly ruled that he could not subordinate this contribution to the condition that the children reside with him, as adult children are free to choose their residence while pursuing their education, and the court adequately responded to the substance of the husband's argument without detailing every point of contention.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAHusband's Appeal on Child Support Conditioned on Adult Children's Residence Rejected: The court rejected the appeal, reasoning that while the appellate court noted the husband's willingness to contribute to the adult children's maintenance based on his means, it correctly ruled that he could not subordinate this contribution to the condition that the children reside with him, as adult children are free to choose their residence while pursuing their education, and the court adequately responded to the substance of the husband's argument without detailing every point of contention.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IADécisions connexes
Généré par l'IATexte complet
SUR LE MOYEN UNIQUE :
ATTENDU QU'IL EST REPROCHE A L'ARRET ATTAQUE QUI, STATUANT SUR L'APPEL D'UNE ORDONNANCE D'UN JUGE AUX AFFAIRES MATRIMONIALES, A CONDAMNE D... A PAYER A SA FEMME, DEMANDERESSE EN DIVORCE, UNE CONTRIBUTION A L'ENTRETIEN DE CHACUN DES TROIS ENFANTS MAJEURS, ISSUS DU MARIAGE, DE N'AVOIR PAS REPONDU A SES CONCLUSIONS PAR LESQUELLES IL INVOQUAIT SON DROIT DE REGARD SUR LES ETUDES DE SES ENFANTS;
MAIS ATTENDU QUE L'ARRET, APRES AVOIR RELEVE QUE LE MARI S'ETAIT DECLARE PRET A CONTRIBUER A L'ENTRETIEN DE SES ENFANTS MAJEURS, DANS LA MESURE DE SES MOYENS, A LA CONDITION QU'ILS VIENNENT VIVRE AVEC LUI AU DOMICILE CONJUGAL, CE QUI LUI PERMETTRAIT DE SURVEILLER LEURS ETUDES, ENONCE QUE LES ENFANTS POURSUIVENT LEURS ETUDES ET QU'ETANT MAJEURS, ILS SONT LIBRES DE CHOISIR LEUR RESIDENCE, D... NE POUVANT SUBORDONNER SA CONTRIBUTION A L'OBLIGATION POUR SES ENFANTS DE VENIR VIVRE AVEC LUI; QUE, PAR CES ENONCIATIONS, LA COUR D'APPEL, QUI N'ETAIT PAS TENUE DE SUIVRE LES PARTIES DANS LE DETAIL DE LEUR ARGUMENTATION, A, REPONDANT AUX CONCLUSIONS, LEGALEMENT JUSTIFIE SA DECISION.
PAR CES MOTIFS :
REJETTE LE POURVOI FORME CONTRE L'ARRET RENDU LE 7 AVRIL 1978 PAR LA COUR D'APPEL DE COLMAR.