Divorce Appeal Dismissal for Lack of Standing Prior to Admissibility Ruling
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAIn a divorce case where one party appealed a judgment granting them the entirety of their initial claims, including a new demand for damages in the appeal, the appellate court wrongly dismissed the new demand without first ruling on the admissibility of the appeal itself, which the opposing party had challenged based on a lack of legal interest to appeal since the initial judgment was entirely favorable to the appellant, thereby violating the articles of the Civil Procedure Code governing the right to appeal and inadmissibility.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAARTICLE 546 DU MEME CODE; Divorce Appeal Dismissal for Lack of Standing Prior to Admissibility Ruling: In a divorce case where one party appealed a judgment granting them the entirety of their initial claims, including a new demand for damages in the appeal, the appellate court wrongly dismissed the new demand without first ruling on the admissibility of the appeal itself, which the opposing party had challenged based on a lack of legal interest to appeal since the initial judgment was entirely favorable to the appellant, thereby violating the articles of the Civil Procedure Code governing the right to appeal and inadmissibility.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IADispositions légales citées
Généré par l'IADécisions connexes
Généré par l'IAQuestions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe appeal was deemed inadmissible for lack of interest because the lower court had already granted the appellant's claims, thus the Court of Appeal violated this article by not ruling on the inadmissibility.
Texte complet
SUR LE MOYEN PRIS DE L'IRRECEVABILITE DE L'APPEL RELEVE D'OFFICE APRES OBSERVATION DES FORMALITES PREVUES PAR L'ARTICLE 1015 DU NOUVEAU CODE DE PROCEDURE CIVILE :
VU LES ARTICLES 125 ET 620 DU NOUVEAU CODE DE PROCEDURE CIVILE, ENSEMBLE L'ARTICLE 546 DU MEME CODE ;
ATTENDU QU'AUX TERMES DU DERNIER DE CES TEXTES, LE DROIT D'APPEL APPARTIENT A TOUTE PARTIE QUI Y A INTERET ; ATTENDU QUE DAME C... A INTERJETE APPEL D'UN JUGEMENT PRONONCANT LE DIVORCE AUX TORTS EXCLUSIFS DE SON MARI ET FIXANT LES MESURES ACCESSOIRES, ET A FORME, EN CAUSE D'APPEL, UNE DEMANDE NOUVELLE DE DOMMAGES-INTERETS ; ATTENDU QUE LE JUGEMENT AYANT ALLOUE A DAME C... L'ENTIER BENEFICE DE SES CONCLUSIONS, SON APPEL, FAUTE D'INTERET, ETAIT IRRECEVABLE ; QUE, DES LORS, LA COUR D'APPEL QUI, OMETTANT DE STATUER SUR CETTE IRRECEVABILITE, CEPENDANT SOULEVEE PAR LE MARI, A REJETE LA DEMANDE NOUVELLE DE DAME C..., A VIOLE LE TEXTE SUSVISE ;
PAR CES MOTIFS :
CASSE ET ANNULE, SANS RENVOI, L'ARRET RENDU ENTRE LES PARTIES LE 26 AVRIL 1978 PAR LA COUR D'APPEL DE RENNES.