Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
78-14564 Généré par l'IA

Appeal Inadmissibility Due to Missed Deadline Despite Fee Waiver Suspension

Numéro de cause 78-14564
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction France (FR)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Irrecevable (Inadmissible)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The appeal to the Supreme Court was deemed inadmissible because it was filed after the statutory two-month deadline following the notification of the contested decision, despite a period of suspension caused by a request for waiver of fees; the decision below was notified on November 25, 1977, the fee waiver request was submitted on December 8, 1977, and rejected on June 12, 1978, meaning the appeal period, which started on November 25, 1977, and was suspended until June 12, 1978, expired on August 11, 1978, making the filing on that date too late.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

ARTICLES 1 ET 2 DU DECRET N 67-1210 DU 22 DECEMBRE 1967; Appeal Inadmissibility Due to Missed Deadline Despite Fee Waiver Suspension: The appeal to the Supreme Court was deemed inadmissible because it was filed after the statutory two-month deadline following the notification of the contested decision, despite a period of suspension caused by a request for waiver of fees; the decision below was notified on November 25, 1977, the fee waiver request was submitted on December 8, 1977, and rejected on June 12, 1978, meaning the appeal period, which started on November 25, 1977, and was suspended until June 12, 1978, expired on August 11, 1978, making the filing on that date too late.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
inobservation du délai délai de suspension notification de la décision date de dépôt forclusion pour tardiveté point de départ de la prescription

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
ARTICLES 1 ET 2 DU DECRET N 67-1210 DU 22 DECEMBRE 1967
This provision establishes the two-month deadline for filing an appeal in cassation, which was exceeded, leading to the inadmissibility ruling.
Généré par l'IA
77-11701
Appeal Inadmissibility Due to Untimely Filing After Fee Waiver Refusal
09-41466
Appeal Inadmissibility Due to Untimely Filing
88-84138
Appeal Admissibility Denied Due to Untimely Filing
12/00249
Appeal Inadmissibility Due to Untimely Filing
94-18581
Appeal Inadmissibility Due to Untimely Filing

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
ARTICLES 1 ET 2 DU DECRET N 67-1210 DU 22 DECEMBRE 1967

This provision establishes the two-month deadline for filing an appeal in cassation, which was exceeded, leading to the inadmissibility ruling.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

SUR LA RECEVABILITE DU POURVOI :

ATTENDU QUE SELON LES ARTICLES 1 ET 2 DU DECRET N 67-1210 DU 22 DECEMBRE 1967, LE POURVOI EN CASSATION EST FORME AU PLUS TARD DANS UN DELAI DE DEUX MOIS A COMPTER DE LA SIGNIFICATION DE LA DECISION ATTAQUEE ;

ATTENDU QUE L'ARRET ATTAQUE (BORDEAUX, 21 NOVEMBRE 1977) A ETE NOTIFIE LE 25 NOVEMBRE 1977 A DAME X... ; QUE LA COMMISSION DES DISPENSES D'HONORAIRES INSTITUEE PAR L'ARTICLE 53 DU DECRET N 58 1291 DU 22 DECEMBRE 1958 AUPRES DE QUI DAME X... AVAIT DEPOSE UNE DEMANDE LE 8 DECEMBRE 1977, LUI A NOTIFIE LE 12 JUIN 1978 LE REJET DE SA REQUETE ; QU'IL S'ENSUIT QUE, SI LE DELAI SUSVISE QUI AVAIT COMMENCE A COURIR LE 25 NOVEMBRE 1977 AVAIT ETE SUSPENDU DU 8 DECEMBRE 1977 AU 12 JUIN 1978, IL ETAIT EXPIRE LE 11 AOUT 1978, DATE OU LE POURVOI EN CASSATION A ETE FORME ; QUE TARDIF IL EST IRRECEVABLE ;

PAR CES MOTIFS :

DECLARE IRRECEVABLE LE POURVOI FORME CONTRE L'ARRET RENDU LE 21 NOVEMBRE 1977 PAR LA COUR D'APPEL DE BORDEAUX.