Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
78-80036 Généré par l'IA

Jurisdiction Over Minor Placement: Appellate Court vs. Departmental Director

Numéro de cause 78-80036
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction France (FR)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The appellate court erred by directly ordering a change in the placement of a minor child, previously entrusted to the departmental social assistance service (DDASS) by a children's judge, by designating a new foster family, because under the relevant articles of the Civil Code and the Code of Family and Social Assistance, once a minor is placed under the authority of the DDASS, it is the departmental director of health and social action, under the prefect's authority, who is responsible for choosing the foster parents, despite the judge retaining certain powers over the minor's overall situation.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

ARTICLE 375-3 DU CODE CIVIL, ARTICLE 79 DU CODE DE LA FAMILLE ET DE L'AIDE SOCIALE, ARTICLE 375-6 DU CODE CIVIL, ARTICLE 375-7 ALINEA 2, DU CODE CIVIL, ARTICLE 888-16 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE CIVILE, ARTICLE 123-3 DU CODE DE LA FAMILLE ET DE L'AIDE SOCIALE; Jurisdiction Over Minor Placement: Appellate Court vs. Departmental Director: The appellate court erred by directly ordering a change in the placement of a minor child, previously entrusted to the departmental social assistance service (DDASS) by a children's judge, by designating a new foster family, because under the relevant articles of the Civil Code and the Code of Family and Social Assistance, once a minor is placed under the authority of the DDASS, it is the departmental director of health and social action, under the prefect's authority, who is responsible for choosing the foster parents, despite the judge retaining certain powers over the minor's overall situation.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
placement de l'enfant enfants mineurs compétences juridictionnelles parent d’accueil fonction publique autorité d'assistance

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
ARTICLE 375-3 DU CODE CIVIL
Cited as one of the main legal grounds alongside Article 79 du Code de la famille et de l'aide sociale for the cassation, concerning the judge's power to entrust a minor to child protective services.
ARTICLE 79 DU CODE DE LA FAMILLE ET DE L'AIDE SOCIALE
Cited as one of the main legal grounds alongside Article 375-3 du Code civil, concerning the director's role in choosing foster parents when a minor is entrusted to child protective services.
ARTICLE 375-6 DU CODE CIVIL
Cited in the reasoning leading to the cassation as a provision whose powers were potentially disregarded by the Court of Appeal when it made a placement decision.
ARTICLE 375-7 ALINEA 2, DU CODE CIVIL
Cited in the reasoning leading to the cassation as a provision whose powers were potentially disregarded by the Court of Appeal when it made a placement decision.
ARTICLE 888-16 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE CIVILE
Cited in the reasoning leading to the cassation as a provision whose powers were potentially disregarded by the Court of Appeal when it made a placement decision.
ARTICLE 123-3 DU CODE DE LA FAMILLE ET DE L'AIDE SOCIALE
Cited in the reasoning leading to the cassation as the provision outlining the conditions under which the administration should determine the placement of the entrusted minor.
Généré par l'IA
15/00051
Child Welfare Service Appeal Regarding Minor's Educational Placement Modalities
JURITEXT000006974149
Minor Placement Institutionalization and Procedural Error in Judgment Publication
22-23646
Minor Placement and Visitation Rights Appeal Based on Failure to Interview Discernible Child
15/00128
Departmental Council and Father v. Placement and Visiting Rights Appeal
15/00056
Department Appeal of Child Protection Jurisdiction and Service Allocation

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
ARTICLE 375-3 DU CODE CIVIL

Cited as one of the main legal grounds alongside Article 79 du Code de la famille et de l'aide sociale for the cassation, concerning the judge's power to entrust a minor to child protective services.

ARTICLE 79 DU CODE DE LA FAMILLE ET DE L'AIDE SOCIALE

Cited as one of the main legal grounds alongside Article 375-3 du Code civil, concerning the director's role in choosing foster parents when a minor is entrusted to child protective services.

ARTICLE 375-6 DU CODE CIVIL

Cited in the reasoning leading to the cassation as a provision whose powers were potentially disregarded by the Court of Appeal when it made a placement decision.

ARTICLE 375-7 ALINEA 2, DU CODE CIVIL

Cited in the reasoning leading to the cassation as a provision whose powers were potentially disregarded by the Court of Appeal when it made a placement decision.

ARTICLE 888-16 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE CIVILE

Cited in the reasoning leading to the cassation as a provision whose powers were potentially disregarded by the Court of Appeal when it made a placement decision.

ARTICLE 123-3 DU CODE DE LA FAMILLE ET DE L'AIDE SOCIALE

Cited in the reasoning leading to the cassation as the provision outlining the conditions under which the administration should determine the placement of the entrusted minor.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

SUR LE MOYEN UNIQUE :

VU L'ARTICLE 375-3 DU CODE CIVIL, ENSEMBLE L'ARTICLE 79 DU CODE DE LA FAMILLE ET DE L'AIDE SOCIALE ;

ATTENDU QUE, D'APRES LE PREMIER DE CES TEXTES, LE JUGE PEUT DECIDER, AU TITRE D'UNE MESURE D'ASSISTANCE EDUCATIVE, DE CONFIER UN MINEUR AU SERVICE DEPARTEMENTAL DE L'AIDE SOCIALE A L'ENFANCE ; QU'IL RESULTE DU SECOND QUE, DANS CE CAS, C'EST LE DIRECTEUR DEPARTEMENTAL DE L'ACTION SANITAIRE ET SOCIALE QUI, SOUS L'AUTORITE DU PREFET, CHOISIT LES PARENTS NOURRICIERS ;

ATTENDU QUE L'ARRET ATTAQUE, QUI A CONFIRME, DANS SON PRINCIPE, UNE DECISION DU JUGE DES ENFANTS CONFIANT LA JEUNE BEATRICE Y... A LA DIRECTION DEPARTEMENTALE DE L'ACTION SANITAIRE ET SOCIALE, A DECIDE QUE LA MINEURE, DONT L'ADMINISTRATION AVAIT EFFECTUE LE PLACEMENT CHEZ LA DAME X..., SERAIT DESORMAIS PLACEE, "PAR LA CANAL DE LA DDASS", CHEZ LES EPOUX Z... ;

ATTENDU QU'EN STATUANT AINSI, ALORS QUE -SANS QU'IL SOIT PORTE ATTEINTE AUX POUVOIRS RECONNUS AU JUGE PAR LES ARTICLES 375-6 ET 375-7 ALINEA 2, DU CODE CIVIL, AINSI QUE PAR L'ARTICLE 888-16 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE CIVILE- IL APPARTENAIT A L'ADMINISTRATION DE DETERMINER, DANS LES CONDITIONS PREVUES NOTAMMENT PAR L'ARTICLE 123-3 DU CODE DE LA FAMILLE ET DE L'AIDE SOCIALE, LE PLACEMENT DE LA MINEURE QUI LUI AVAIT ETE CONFIEE PAR L'AUTORITE JUDICIAIRE, LA COUR D'APPEL A VIOLE LES TEXTES SUSVISES ;

PAR CES MOTIFS :

CASSE ET ANNULE L'ARRET RENDU ENTRE LES PARTIES LE 23 FEVRIER 1978 PAR LA COUR D'APPEL DE GRENOBLE ; REMET, EN CONSEQUENCE, LA CAUSE ET LES PARTIES AU MEME ET SEMBLABLE ETAT OU ELLES ETAIENT AVANT LEDIT ARRET, ET, POUR ETRE FAIT DROIT, LES RENVOIE DEVANT LA COUR D'APPEL DE CHAMBERY.