Insurance Indemnity Dispute Over Property Acquisition and Policy Cancellation
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAAn agricultural land group was ordered to pay an insurance company indemnity for the cancellation of fire insurance contracts on buildings it acquired, which the prior owner had underwritten. The appealing party contended the lower court failed to rule on arguments that the disputed clauses were not visibly highlighted, the policy was unsigned by the insured, and the indemnity amount stipulated was not included in the general conditions or statutes at the relevant date. However, the reviewing court rejected the appeal because it was not established that the lower court had been presented with the specific arguments being raised on appeal.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAInsurance Indemnity Dispute Over Property Acquisition and Policy Cancellation: The appealing party contended the lower court failed to rule on arguments that the disputed clauses were not visibly highlighted, the policy was unsigned by the insured, and the indemnity amount stipulated was not included in the general conditions or statutes at the relevant date. However, the reviewing court rejected the appeal because it was not established that the lower court had been presented with the specific arguments being raised on appeal.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IADécisions connexes
Généré par l'IATexte complet
SUR LE MOYEN UNIQUE : ATTENDU QUE LE JUGEMENT ATTAQUE A CONDAMNE LE GROUPEMENT AGRICOLE FONCIER D'ELEVAGE ET DE CULTURE A PAYER A LA SOCIETE D'ASSURANCES MUTUELLES D'EURE-ET-LOIR UNE INDEMNITE DE 2 101,45 FRANCS POUR, A LA SUITE DE L'ACQUISITION DE BATIMENTS APPARTENANT A MORIZEAU, AVOIR RESILIE LES CONTRATS D'ASSURANCE INCENDIE SOUSCRITS POUR CES IMMEUBLES PAR CE DERNIER ;
ATTENDU QUE LE POURVOI FAIT GRIEF AU TRIBUNAL D'AVOIR LAISSE SANS REPONSE DES CONCLUSIONS SOUTENANT QUE LA POLICE, DONT LES CLAUSES LITIGIEUSES N'AURAIENT PAS ETE MENTIONNEES EN CARACTERES APPARENTS, N'AVAIT PAS ETE SIGNEE PAR L'ASSURE ET QUE L'INDEMNITE N'ETAIT, A LA DATE INDIQUEE, COMME ETANT CELLE DES CONTRATS, STIPULEE NI PAR LES CONDITIONS GENERALES, NI PAR LES STATUTS ;
MAIS ATTENDU QU'IL N'EST PAS ETABLI QUE LE TRIBUNAL AIT ETE SAISI DES CONCLUSIONS ALLEGUEES ;
QUE LE MOYEN NE PEUT DONC ETRE ACCUEILLI ;
PAR CES MOTIFS : REJETTE LE POURVOI FORME CONTRE LE JUGEMENT RENDU LE 3 JUILLET 1973 PAR LE TRIBUNAL D'INSTANCE DE CHARTRES.