Electoral Roll Removal Notification Challenge Upheld
France (FR)
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe appellant challenged a lower court's decision rejecting their objection to being removed from the electoral roll, arguing a violation of electoral code provisions, but the reviewing court upheld the rejection because the lower court correctly found that the administrative decision to strike the name was properly notified to the interested party by registered letter sent to their electoral domicile, thereby satisfying the formalities required by other relevant articles of the electoral code, which constituted a correct application of the challenged article.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAArticle L 34 du code électoral, Articles L 23 et L 25 du code électoral; Electoral Roll Removal Notification Challenge Upheld: The appellant challenged a lower court's decision rejecting their objection to being removed from the electoral roll, arguing a violation of electoral code provisions, but the reviewing court upheld the rejection because the lower court correctly found that the administrative decision to strike the name was properly notified to the interested party by registered letter sent to their electoral domicile, thereby satisfying the formalities required by other relevant articles of the electoral code, which constituted a correct application of the challenged article.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IADispositions légales citées
Généré par l'IADécisions connexes
Généré par l'IAQuestions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe court implicitly confirmed the correct application of this article by rejecting the appeal that alleged its violation.
The court cited these articles to confirm that the formal requirements for notification were met, thereby justifying the rejection of the appeal.
Texte complet
ATTENDU QUE ROSSELIN FAIT GRIEF A LA DECISION ATTAQUEE, RENDUE PAR LE JUGE DU TRIBUNAL D'INSTANCE DU 17EME ARRONDISSEMENT DE PARIS, D'AVOIR, EN VIOLATION DES DISPOSITIONS DE L'ARTICLE L 34 DU CODE ELECTORAL, REJETE SA RECLAMATION CONTRE SA RADIATION DE LA LISTE ELECTORAL DE CET ARRONDISSEMENT;
MAIS ATTENDU QUE LE JUGEMENT DEFERE CONSTATE QUE LA DECISION DE RADIATION AVAIT ETE NOTIFIEE A L'INTERESSE PAR LETTRE RECOMMANDEE ADRESSEE LE 12 DECEMBRE 1973 A SON DOMICILE ELECTORAL;
QUE PAR CE MOTIF, D'OU IL RESULTE QU'IL N'Y AVAIT PAS EU INOBSERVATION DES FORMALITES PRESCRITES PAR LES ARTICLES L 23 ET L 25 DU CODE ELECTORAL, LE TRIBUNAL D'INSTANCE, LOIN DE VIOLER L'ARTICLE L 34 DU MEME CODE, EN A FAIT UNE EXACTE APPLICATION;
PAR CES MOTIFS : REJETTE LE POURVOI FORME CONTRE LE JUGEMENT RENDU LE 5 MAI 1974 PAR LE TRIBUNAL D'INSTANCE DE PARIS (17EME ARRONDISSEMENT)