Improper Service in Absentee Appeal Leading to Quashed Judgment
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe Court of Cassation quashed a decision of the Court of Appeal because the appellate judgment, deemed contradictory despite the respondent's non-appearance, was based on a reassignment that was improperly served to the public prosecutor's office as the respondent had no known address, violating Civil Procedure Articles 149 and 470, which require personal service of the summons or reassignment for a final ruling on the merits in appeal proceedings when the opposing party is absent.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAARTICLES 149 ET 470 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE CIVILE, ARTICLES 149 ET 470 SUSVISES; Improper Service in Absentee Appeal Leading to Quashed Judgment: The Court of Cassation quashed a decision of the Court of Appeal because the appellate judgment, deemed contradictory despite the respondent's non-appearance, was based on a reassignment that was improperly served to the public prosecutor's office as the respondent had no known address, violating Civil Procedure Articles 149 and 470, which require personal service of the summons or reassignment for a final ruling on the merits in appeal proceedings when the opposing party is absent.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IADispositions légales citées
Généré par l'IADécisions connexes
Généré par l'IAQuestions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator
Généré par l'IAThese articles were violated because the judgment was rendered by default ('réputé contradictoire') despite the summons not having been delivered to the defendant's person.
The court expressly states that the appealed judgment violated these articles, leading to the cassation.
Texte complet
SUR LE MOYEN UNIQUE : VU LES ARTICLES 149 ET 470 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE CIVILE, APPLICABLES A LA CAUSE ;
ATTENDU QU'IL NE PEUT, EN CAUSE D'APPEL, ETRE STATUE AU FOND PAR ARRET REPUTE CONTRADICTOIRE LORSQUE NI L'EXPLOIT D'ASSIGNATION, NI L'EXPLOIT DE REASSIGNATION, N'ONT ETE DELIVRES A LA PERSONNE DE L'INTIME ;
ATTENDU QUE, POUR DECLARER SA DECISION " REPUTEE CONTRADICTOIRE ", L'ARRET ATTAQUE, RENDU ENTRE LES EPOUX X..., CONSTATE QUE L'INTIME NE COMPARAIT PAS " QUOIQUE REGULIEREMENT REASSIGNE " ;
MAIS ATTENDU QU'IL RESULTE DE L'ARRET ET DU DOSSIER DE LA PROCEDURE QUE LA " REASSIGNATION " A ETE DELIVREE A X... " ACTUELLEMENT SANS DOMICILE CONNU ", AU PARQUET ;
D'OU IL SUIT QUE L'ARRET A VIOLE LES ARTICLES 149 ET 470 SUSVISES ;
PAR CES MOTIFS : CASSE ET ANNULE L'ARRET RENDU LE 11 JANVIER 1971 ENTRE LES PARTIES PAR LA COUR D'APPEL D'AIX-EN-PROVENCE (3EME CHAMBRE) ;
REMET EN CONSEQUENCE LA CAUSE ET LES PARTIES AU MEME ET SEMBLABLE ETAT OU ELLES ETAIENT AVANT LEDIT ARRET ET, POUR ETRE FAIT DROIT, LES RENVOIE DEVANT LA COUR D'APPEL DE NIMES