Property Owners' Appeal Barred by Request for Closed Gate
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAProperty owners appealed a decision that nullified a co-ownership general assembly resolution mandating the condemnation of an access gate to a boulevard, arguing the appellate court overstepped by ordering the appellants, who alone possessed the key, to keep the gate closed, but the court dismissed the appeal because the appellants had explicitly requested in their appellate brief that the repaired gate remain constantly closed and only accessible via their key, meaning they could not appeal a decision that granted them the requested relief, rendering their ground for appeal inadmissible due to lack of interest.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAProperty Owners' Appeal Barred by Request for Closed Gate: Property owners appealed a decision that nullified a co-ownership general assembly resolution mandating the condemnation of an access gate to a boulevard, arguing the appellate court overstepped by ordering the appellants, who alone possessed the key, to keep the gate closed, but the court dismissed the appeal because the appellants had explicitly requested in their appellate brief that the repaired gate remain constantly closed and only accessible via their key, meaning they could not appeal a decision that granted them the requested relief, rendering their ground for appeal inadmissible due to lack of interest.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IADécisions connexes
Généré par l'IATexte complet
SUR LE MOYEN UNIQUE : ATTENDU QUE LES EPOUX X... FONT GRIEF A L'ARRET ATTAQUE, QUI, A LEUR DEMANDE, A DECLARE NULLE LA DELIBERATION, EN DATE DU 21 FEVRIER 1969, PAR LAQUELLE L'ASSEMBLEE GENERALE DE LA COPROPRIETE IMMOBILIERE, DONT ILS SONT MEMBRES, AVAIT DECIDE DE CONDAMNER LE PORTAIL DONNANT ACCES SUR LE BOULEVARD DE CIMIEZ, D'AVOIR STATUE EN DEHORS DES LIMITES DES CONCLUSIONS DES PARTIES ET COMMIS UN EXCES DE POUVOIR, EN PRESCRIVANT QUE LES EPOUX X..., QUI RECOUVRAIENT LE LIVRE PASSAGE PAR CE PORTAIL, DEVRAIENT LE TENIR FERME AU MOYEN D'UNE CLEF DONT ILS AURAIENT LA GARDE ;
MAIS ATTENDU QUE, DANS LEURS CONCLUSIONS D'APPEL, LES DEMANDEURS AU POURVOI AVAIENT INDIQUE QU'IL ECHET D'OBSERVER QUE LE PORTAIL, REMIS EN ETAT, DEVAIT DEMEURER CONSTAMMENT FERME, L'USAGER EN AYANT SEUL LA CLEF ;
QUE, DES LORS, ILS NE SONT PAS RECEVABLES A CRITIQUER LES DISPOSITIONS DE L'ARRET QUI, SUR CE POINT, LEUR ONT DONNE SATISFACTION ;
D'OU IL SUIT QUE, FAUTE D'INTERET, LE MOYEN EST IRRECEVABLE ;
PAR CES MOTIFS : REJETTE LE POURVOI FORME CONTRE L'ARRET RENDU LE 3 DECEMBRE 1970, PAR LA COUR D'APPEL D'AIX-EN-PROVENCE.