Expropriation Appeal Rejected on Procedural and Relevance Grounds
France (FR)
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe court rejected an appeal challenging an expropriation order granted to a municipality for a parcel of land, first because the appellant claimed the mandatory amicable agreement attempt had not occurred, but the court found that documents proving the lack of such agreement were not among those required to be transmitted by the prefect to the expropriation judge under the relevant decree, rendering the first ground inadmissible; second, the appeal's claim regarding the intended use of the expropriated property was deemed inadmissible because it raised an issue foreign to the challenged expropriation order itself.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAARTICLE 15 DU DECRET DU 20 NOVEMBRE 1959, REJETTE LE POURVOI; Expropriation Appeal Rejected on Procedural and Relevance Grounds: The court rejected an appeal challenging an expropriation order granted to a municipality for a parcel of land, first because the appellant claimed the mandatory amicable agreement attempt had not occurred, but the court found that documents proving the lack of such agreement were not among those required to be transmitted by the prefect to the expropriation judge under the relevant decree, rendering the first ground inadmissible; second, the appeal's claim regarding the intended use of the expropriated property was deemed inadmissible because it raised an issue foreign to the challenged expropriation order itself.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IADispositions légales citées
Généré par l'IADécisions connexes
Généré par l'IAQuestions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator
Généré par l'IACited in the reasoning to reject the first ground of appeal because the required documents for the amicable agreement attempt were not missing from the transmission list.
The court rejected the appeal.
Texte complet
SUR LE PREMIER MOYEN : ATTENDU QU'IL EST FAIT GRIEF A L'ORDONNANCE ATTAQUEE QUI PRONONCE, AU PROFIT DE LA COMMUNE DE RAIMBEAUCOURT, L'EXPROPRIATION D'UNE PARCELLE DE TERRE APPARTENANT A REANT, D'AVOIR ETE RENDUE "ALORS QUE, DANS LE COURS DE LA PROCEDURE, IL N'A JAMAIS ETE PROCEDE A LA TENTATIVE D'ACCORD AMIABLE" ;
MAIS ATTENDU QUE LES PIECES CONSTATANT LE DEFAUT D'ACCORD AMIABLE NE FIGURENT PAS DANS L'ENUMERATION DE CELLES QUI, AUX TERMES DE L'ARTICLE 15 DU DECRET DU 20 NOVEMBRE 1959, DOIVENT ETRE TRANSMISES PAR LE PREFET AU JUGE DE L'EXPROPRIATION ;
D'OU IL SUIT QUE LE MOYEN NE PEUT ETRE ACCUEILLI ;
SUR LE SECOND MOYEN : ATTENDU QUE LE POURVOI CRITIQUE LA DESTINATION QUE LA COMMUNE EXPROPRIANTE ENTENDRAIT DONNER AU BIEN EXPROPRIE ;
MAIS ATTENDU QU'UN TEL MOYEN EST ETRANGER A L'ORDONNANCE ATTAQUEE ;
QU'IL EST IRRECEVABLE ;
PAR CES MOTIFS : REJETTE LE POURVOI FORME CONTRE L'ORDONNANCE RENDUE LE 25 MAI 1970 PAR LE JUGE DE L'EXPROPRIATION DU DEPARTEMENT DU NORD.