Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
70-40179 Généré par l'IA

Appeal Inadmissibility Due to Procedural Deficiencies

Numéro de cause 70-40179
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction France (FR)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Irrecevable (Inadmissible)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The appeal lodged on March 6, 1970, against a decision from the Aix-en-Provence Court of Appeal dated December 8, 1969, was declared inadmissible because the declaration of appeal failed to state any grounds or indicate any legal provision violated or misapplied by the appellate decision, and the subsequent memorandum filed on April 30, 1970, was neither signed by the appellant or a legally authorized representative nor produced in the required number of copies for notification to the opposing party, thereby failing to meet the mandatory requirements established by the relevant procedural decrees.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

ARTICLE 31 DU DECRET N° 67-1210 DU 22 DECEMBRE 1967, ARTICLE 27 DU DECRET N° 67-1210 DU 22 DECEMBRE 1967, ARTICLE 26 DU DECRET N° 67-1210 DU 22 DECEMBRE 1967; Appeal Inadmissibility Due to Procedural Deficiencies: The appeal lodged on March 6, 1970, against a decision from the Aix-en-Provence Court of Appeal dated December 8, 1969, was declared inadmissible because the declaration of appeal failed to state any grounds or indicate any legal provision violated or misapplied by the appellate decision, and the subsequent memorandum filed on April 30, 1970, was neither signed by the appellant or a legally authorized representative nor produced in the required number of copies for notification to the opposing party, thereby failing to meet the mandatory requirements established by the relevant procedural decrees.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
condition de recevabilité notification de la décision exception d'inconstitutionnalité représentant autorisé recours contre décision de renvoi production tardive de pièces

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
ARTICLE 31 DU DECRET N° 67-1210 DU 22 DECEMBRE 1967
The appeal was declared inadmissible because the filing did not comply with the requirements of this article (among others), particularly regarding the content of the declaration of appeal.
ARTICLE 27 DU DECRET N° 67-1210 DU 22 DECEMBRE 1967
The appeal was declared inadmissible because the memorandum was not signed by a duly authorized representative as required by this article.
ARTICLE 26 DU DECRET N° 67-1210 DU 22 DECEMBRE 1967
The appeal was declared inadmissible because the declaration of appeal failed to state any ground or violation of law, as required by this article.
Généré par l'IA
87-43984
Appeal Inadmissibility Due to Procedural Deficiencies
00-60003
Appeal Inadmissibility Due to Procedural Deficiencies in Cassation Filing
JURITEXT000006947769
Appeal Inadmissibility Due to Procedural Deficiencies
88-40458
Appeal Inadmissibility Due to Procedural Deficiencies
JURITEXT000006980037
Appeal Inadmissibility Due to Failure to Follow Formal Procedural Requirements

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
ARTICLE 31 DU DECRET N° 67-1210 DU 22 DECEMBRE 1967

The appeal was declared inadmissible because the filing did not comply with the requirements of this article (among others), particularly regarding the content of the declaration of appeal.

ARTICLE 27 DU DECRET N° 67-1210 DU 22 DECEMBRE 1967

The appeal was declared inadmissible because the memorandum was not signed by a duly authorized representative as required by this article.

ARTICLE 26 DU DECRET N° 67-1210 DU 22 DECEMBRE 1967

The appeal was declared inadmissible because the declaration of appeal failed to state any ground or violation of law, as required by this article.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

SUR LA RECEVABILITE DU POURVOI : VU LES ARTICLES 26, 27 ET 31 DU DECRET N° 67-1210 DU 22 DECEMBRE 1967 ;

ATTENDU QUE X... S'EST POURVU EN CASSATION LE 6 MARS 1970 CONTRE UN ARRET DE LA COUR D'APPEL D'AIX-EN-PROVENCE RENDU A SON ENCONTRE ET AU PROFIT DE LA SOCIETE DES TRANSPORTS REBOTIER FRERES LE 8 DECEMBRE 1969 ;

QUE LA DECLARATION DE POURVOI NE FORMULE AUCUN MOYEN ET NE COMPORTE L'INDICATION D'AUCUNE DISPOSITION LEGALE QUI AURAIT ETE VIOLEE OU FAUSSEMENT APPLIQUEE PAR LEDIT ARRET ;

QUE LE MEMOIRE DEPOSE LE 30 AVRIL 1970 N'A PAS ETE SIGNE PAR LE DEMANDEUR AU POURVOI OU PAR UN MANDATAIRE AYANT LEGALEMENT QUALITE POUR LE REPRESENTER, MAIS PAR UN AVOCAT, SANS ALLEGATION DE L'EXISTENCE D'UN POUVOIR QUELCONQUE ;

QUE, DE PLUS, IL N'A ETE PRODUIT QU'EN UN SEUL EXEMPLAIRE MALGRE LES RECLAMATIONS DU GREFFE ET N'A PU ETRE NOTIFIE AU DEFENDEUR ;

QUE LE POURVOI, NON CONFORME AUX EXIGENCES DES TEXTES SUSVISES, DOIT, DES LORS, ETRE DECLARE IRRECEVABLE ;

PAR CES MOTIFS : DECLARE IRRECEVABLE LE POURVOI FORME CONTRE L'ARRET RENDU LE 8 DECEMBRE 1969 PAR LA COUR D'APPEL D'AIX-EN-PROVENCE ;