Seller v. Buyer Boundary Dispute Over Structure Placement

A property owner, after selling a house, sought to compel the buyer to remove a structure built on the boundary line, alleging it violated an agreement that specified the building's orientation and setback, though the agreement did not explicitly detail the exact location of the structure relative to the boundary, and the buyer had proceeded with construction based on approved municipal permits. The court rejected the owner's claim, reasoning that the contractual provision regarding orientation and setback was not sufficiently precise to mandate the removal of the structure, particularly since the construction adhered to the permits issued by the local authority, thus affirming the validity of the construction as executed.