JURITEXT000006962514 Généré par l'IA

Contract Interpretation and Factual Findings in Damages Dispute

Numéro de cause JURITEXT000006962514

Autorité / Tribunal Cour de cassation

Juridiction

France (FR)

Date de la décision 1963-04-25

Issue du litige Rejeté (Dismissed)

Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

A party contesting a judgment for damages, arguing that the lower court misinterpreted a contractual clause regarding the valuation of materials supplied by the injured party, was rejected because the Court of Cassation found the lower court's interpretation was based on a factual finding that was not subject to review; the interpretation of a contract, when it does not alter the explicit wording, belongs to the trial judge whose findings on the evidence and interpretation of the common intention of the parties are sovereign.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

Contract Interpretation and Factual Findings in Damages Dispute: A party contesting a judgment for damages, arguing that the lower court misinterpreted a contractual clause regarding the valuation of materials supplied by the injured party, was rejected because the Court of Cassation found the lower court's interpretation was based on a factual finding that was not subject to review; the interpretation of a contract, when it does not alter the explicit wording, belongs to the trial judge whose findings on the evidence and interpretation of the common intention of the parties are sovereign.