Acquiescence to Judgment Through Voluntary Execution of Division of Successions
France (FR)
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAAn appeal was declared inadmissible because the parties who brought the appeal, having contested a ruling that expanded a judicial administrator's mandate over various estates to include collecting revenues and rendering accounts, subsequently executed a division of the commingled successions which explicitly incorporated the administrator's account, with the resulting balance being allocated to some of the co-indivisees; the court reasoned that by voluntarily accepting this division without reservation, the parties unequivocally demonstrated their acquiescence to the very decision they were appealing.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAIRRECEVABILITE; Acquiescence to Judgment Through Voluntary Execution of Division of Successions: An appeal was declared inadmissible because the parties who brought the appeal, having contested a ruling that expanded a judicial administrator's mandate over various estates to include collecting revenues and rendering accounts, subsequently executed a division of the commingled successions which explicitly incorporated the administrator's account, with the resulting balance being allocated to some of the co-indivisees; the court reasoned that by voluntarily accepting this division without reservation, the parties unequivocally demonstrated their acquiescence to the very decision they were appealing.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IADispositions légales citées
Généré par l'IADécisions connexes
Généré par l'IAQuestions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe appeal was declared inadmissible due to the parties' acquiescence to the contested decision.
Texte complet
SUR L'EXCEPTION D'IRRECEVABILITE SOULEVEE PAR LA DEFENSE : ATTENDU QU'UNE ORDONNANCE DE REFERE AYANT CHARGE RAVAULT, ADMINISTRATEUR JUDICIAIRE, DE GERER LES BIENS DEPENDANT DE LA SUCCESSION DE LOUIS X..., CETTE MISSION A ETE ETENDUE PAR LA COUR D'APPEL AUX IMMEUBLES PROVENANT DE LA SUCCESSION DE LA DAME LOUIS MARTIN OU DE CEUX QUI AVAIENT FAIT L'OBJET D'UNE DONATION-PARTAGE CONSENTIE PAR LOUIS MARTIN, RAVAULT DEVANT ENCAISSER LES REVENUS ET RENDRE COMPTE ENSUITE A QUI IL APPARTIENDRAIT ;
QUE LES CONSORTS X..., QUI AVAIENT FORME UN POURVOI CONTRE CET ARRET INFIRMATIF. ONT, PAR ACTE DU 27 SEPTEMBRE 1962, PROCEDE AU PARTAGE DES SUCCESSIONS CONFONDUES DES EPOUX X... ;
QUE DANS CE PARTAGE ETAIT COMPRIS LE COMPTE DE L'ADMINISTRATEUR JUDICIAIRE, DONT LE SOLDE A ETE ATTRIBUE A DEUX DES CO-INDIVISAIRES ;
ATTENDU QU'EN ACCEPTANT CE PARTAGE SANS FORMULER AUCUNE RESERVE, LES CONSORTS X... ONT, PAR UN ACTE VOLONTAIRE ET NON EQUIVOQUE MANIFESTE LEUR INTENTION D'ACQUIESCER A LA DECISION PAR EUX ATTAQUEE ;
PAR CES MOTIFS : DECLARE IRRECEVABLE LE POURVOI FORME CONTRE L'ARRET RENDU LE 13 JUIN 1961 PAR LA COUR D'APPEL DE PARIS. NO 61-13.438. CONSORTS X... C/ EPOUX ETIENNE X.... PRESIDENT : M. BORNET. - RAPPORTEUR : M. ANCEL. - AVOCAT GENERAL : M. ITHIER. - AVOCATS : MM. COMPAIN ET VIDART.