Contractor's Unauthorized Material Replacement Justifies Owner's Refusal to Pay
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAA contractor, having been obligated under a construction contract to replace defective materials, proceeded to install new materials without obtaining prior authorization from the owner, leading the owner to refuse payment for the replacement work. The Court of Cassation quashed the lower court's decision, reasoning that although the contractor was initially obliged to rectify defects, the unilateral decision to replace the materials without the owner's consent constituted an unauthorized act, thereby justifying the owner's refusal to pay for the substituted work executed outside the terms of the original agreement.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAContractor's Unauthorized Material Replacement Justifies Owner's Refusal to Pay: The Court of Cassation quashed the lower court's decision, reasoning that although the contractor was initially obliged to rectify defects, the unilateral decision to replace the materials without the owner's consent constituted an unauthorized act, thereby justifying the owner's refusal to pay for the substituted work executed outside the terms of the original agreement.