Lessee's Failure to Perform Court-Ordered Repairs Justifies Lessor's Reimbursement Claim

A lessee, having obtained a judicial decision ordering the lessor to perform necessary repairs under the terms of the lease, failed to execute the decision within the time limit set by the court, leading the lessor to carry out the repairs himself and seek reimbursement from the lessee. The court rejected the appeal, reasoning that the lessee's failure to comply with the prior judicial order to execute the stipulated repairs justified the lessor's subsequent action to perform those essential repairs and claim the resulting costs from the defaulting party.