Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
JURITEXT000006958333 Généré par l'IA

Judgment Annulled for Failure to Record Mayor's Appearance or Excuse in Rural Lease Case

Numéro de cause JURITEXT000006958333
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction France (FR)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The court annulled a judgment from the rural lease jurisdiction because the decision failed to state whether the mayor of the commune had appeared in person, as required by the applicable rural code, or if a valid excuse for non-appearance had been accepted by the tribunal. The reviewing court could not verify compliance with the legal requirements because the judgment lacked these essential mentions, and an attestation of presence from the tribunal's secretary could not cure these procedural defects.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

ARTICLE 970 DU CODE RURAL ALORS EN VIGUEUR, ARTICLE 142 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE CIVILE; Judgment Annulled for Failure to Record Mayor's Appearance or Excuse in Rural Lease Case: The reviewing court could not verify compliance with the legal requirements because the judgment lacked these essential mentions, and an attestation of presence from the tribunal's secretary could not cure these procedural defects.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
incompétence ratione materiae absence d'obligation communale vice de procédure effets d'un arrêt d'annulation recours en annulation en droit de l'Union jugement civil

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
ARTICLE 970 DU CODE RURAL ALORS EN VIGUEUR
This provision established the obligation for parties to appear in person before the bipartite jurisdiction for rural leases, which was violated according to the reasoning leading to the cassation.
ARTICLE 142 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE CIVILE
Cited in the reasoning regarding the insufficiency of an attestation to remedy the procedural deficiencies of the judgment, although this citation appears in the reasoning section leading to the decision, not the dispositive itself. Given that the instruction specifies including only provisions explicitly cited in the final orders (dispositive), and only Article 970 appears to be the basis for the *cassation*, while Article 142 is only used to assess the procedural piece provided by the commune, I will prioritize the explicit ground for cassation based on the main text flow. However, since the text does not provide a numbered dispositive section listing articles, I must rely on the explicit mention in the 'CASSE ET ANNULE' section. The text explicitly mentions Article 970 as the basis for the cassation.
Généré par l'IA
2106450
Building Permit Annulment Denied for Lack of Property Documentation
2207709
Annulment of Municipal Decree Mandating Public Reporting of Tenant Evictions
2207420
Annulment of Municipal Council Deliberations Rejected Due to Insufficient Detail and Lack of Standing
2104321
Applicant v. Mayor Regarding Failure to Produce Cadastral Document
1909648
Litigant Fails to Establish Property Standing in Municipal Decision Challenge

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
ARTICLE 970 DU CODE RURAL ALORS EN VIGUEUR

This provision established the obligation for parties to appear in person before the bipartite jurisdiction for rural leases, which was violated according to the reasoning leading to the cassation.

ARTICLE 142 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE CIVILE

Cited in the reasoning regarding the insufficiency of an attestation to remedy the procedural deficiencies of the judgment, although this citation appears in the reasoning section leading to the decision, not the dispositive itself. Given that the instruction specifies including only provisions explicitly cited in the final orders (dispositive), and only Article 970 appears to be the basis for the *cassation*, while Article 142 is only used to assess the procedural piece provided by the commune, I will prioritize the explicit ground for cassation based on the main text flow. However, since the text does not provide a numbered dispositive section listing articles, I must rely on the explicit mention in the 'CASSE ET ANNULE' section. The text explicitly mentions Article 970 as the basis for the cassation.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

SUR LE MOYEN UNIQUE : VU L'ARTICLE 970 DU CODE RURAL ALORS EN VIGUEUR ;

ATTENDU QUE CE TEXTE IMPOSAIT AUX PARTIES L'OBLIGATION DE COMPARAITRE EN PERSONNE DEVANT LA JURIDICTION PARITAIRE DES BAUX RURAUX SAUF EN CAS D'EXCUSE JUGEE VALABLE PAR LE TRIBUNAL ;

OR ATTENDU QUE LE JUGEMENT ATTAQUE NE MENTIONNE NI LA PRESENCE DU MAIRE DE LA COMMUNE DE LA VILLE-EN-BLAISOIS, NI L'EXCUSE QUI AURAIT ETE JUGEE VALABLE ;

QUE L'ATTESTATION DE LA PRESENCE DU MAIRE A L'AUDIENCE, DELIVREE PAR LLE SECRETAIRE DU TRIBUNAL PARITAIRE D'ARRONDISSEMENT ET PRODUITE PAR LA COMMUNE NE SAURAIT ETRE CONSIDEREE COMME UNE "PIECE DE PROCEDURE" AU SENS DE L'ARTICLE 142 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE CIVILE POUR SUPPLEER AUX LACUNES DU JUGEMENT ET, QU'AINSI, LA COUR DE CASSATION N'EST PAS EN MESURE DE VERIFIER S'IL A ETE SATISFAIT AUX PRESCRIPTIONS LEGALES ;

PAR CES MOTIFS : CASSE ET ANNULE LE JUGEMENT RENDU ENTRE LES PARTIES PAR LE TRIBUNAL PARITAIRE D'ARRONDISSEMENT DE WASSY LE 22 OCTOBRE 1958 ;

REMET EN CONSEQUENCE LA CAUSE ET LES PARTIES AU MEME ET SEMBLABLE ETAT OU ELLES ETAIENT AVANT LEDIT JUGEMENT ET, POUR ETRE FAIT DROIT, LES RENVOIE DEVANT LA COUR D'APPEL DE DIJON.NO 59-10.276. GOUTHIERE C/ LA COMMUNE DE VILLE-EN-BLAISOIS.PRESIDENT : M. Y.... - RAPPORTEUR : MME LAGARDE. - AVOCAT GENRAL : M. X.... - AVOCATS : MM. BEURDELEY ET BROUCHOT.