Contract Annulment Due to Potestative Condition Precedent
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAA party to a civil contract, whose obligations were contingent upon a prior condition precedent involving an administrative authorization, sued for breach after the authorization was finally refused, seeking annulment of the contract and damages; the court rejected the appeal, reasoning that the obligation was subject to a potestative condition dependent solely on the will of the debtor, rendering the underlying commitment null and void from its inception, thus precluding any claim for breach damages against the other party who had not defaulted.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAContract Annulment Due to Potestative Condition Precedent: A party to a civil contract, whose obligations were contingent upon a prior condition precedent involving an administrative authorization, sued for breach after the authorization was finally refused, seeking annulment of the contract and damages; the court rejected the appeal, reasoning that the obligation was subject to a potestative condition dependent solely on the will of the debtor, rendering the underlying commitment null and void from its inception, thus precluding any claim for breach damages against the other party who had not defaulted.