Sale of Goods Dispute: Buyer's Failure to Timely and Sufficiently Prove Defects

The case concerned a dispute arising from a contract for the sale of goods where the buyer alleged defects that rendered the goods unfit for their intended purpose and sought termination of the sale and damages; the court of appeal had upheld the trial court's decision to dismiss the buyer's claims, finding that the buyer had failed to provide sufficient proof regarding the seriousness and origin of the alleged defects and had not acted within the stipulated time frame for denouncing the alleged non-conformity. The high court affirmed this decision, reasoning that the factual findings regarding the lack of timely and sufficient proof by the buyer justified the rejection of the claims for breach of warranty against hidden defects and for contractual breach.