Building Owner's Lost Appeal Bars Subsequent Compensation Claim for Demolition
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAA building owner failed to appeal a decision ordering the demolition of an encroachment on an adjacent property within the legally prescribed time limit; consequently, the owner sought to invoke a later, distinct right to compensation for the expropriation of the encroachment, but the court rejected this claim, reasoning that the initial, unappealed demolition order became definitive, extinguishing any right to compensation based on the continued existence of the encroachment, as the party could no longer challenge the factual or legal basis that justified the prior order.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IABuilding Owner's Lost Appeal Bars Subsequent Compensation Claim for Demolition: A building owner failed to appeal a decision ordering the demolition of an encroachment on an adjacent property within the legally prescribed time limit; consequently, the owner sought to invoke a later, distinct right to compensation for the expropriation of the encroachment, but the court rejected this claim, reasoning that the initial, unappealed demolition order became definitive, extinguishing any right to compensation based on the continued existence of the encroachment, as the party could no longer challenge the factual or legal basis that justified the prior order.