Electoral Appeal Remanded for Full Hearing to Respect Right to Defense
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe court addressed an appeal challenging a lower court decision concerning an electoral matter, noting that while the Electoral Code mandates urgent resolution, this must be reconciled with the fundamental principle of respecting the right to defense. Since both parties in the current appeal were represented by counsel and responsive briefs had been filed, but the case was not yet formally scheduled for the day's hearing, the matter was deemed not ready for judgment, leading the higher court to refer the case back to be heard on a subsequent date.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAARRET N° 3; Electoral Appeal Remanded for Full Hearing to Respect Right to Defense: Since both parties in the current appeal were represented by counsel and responsive briefs had been filed, but the case was not yet formally scheduled for the day's hearing, the matter was deemed not ready for judgment, leading the higher court to refer the case back to be heard on a subsequent date.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IADispositions légales citées
Généré par l'IADécisions connexes
Généré par l'IAQuestions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe court issues a final order (ARRET N° 3) referring the case to a future hearing without explicitly citing a substantive article in the dispositive, thus requiring checking the implicit procedural basis for the referral.
This phrase constitutes the operative order, resulting from the finding that the case was not ready for judgment, despite the urgency implied by Article 29 of the Electoral Code.
Texte complet
ARRET N° 3 :
STATUANT SUR LE POURVOI DE BAGNOLI, CONTRE UN JUGEMENT DU TRIBUNAL D'INSTANCE DE BASTIA, EN DATE DU 7 JANVIER 1961, CONCERNANT L'AFFAIRE FILIPPI ET AUTRES ;
ATTENDU QUE L'ARTICLE 29 DU CODE ELECTORAL PRESCRIT QU'IL DOIT ETRE STATUE D'URGENCE EN LA MATIERE ;
MAIS ATTENDU QUE CETTE DISPOSITION DOIT SE CONCILIER AVEC LE PRINCIPE DU RESPECT DU DROIT DE LA DEFENSE ;
ATTENDU QU'EN L'ESPECE, LE DEMANDEUR ET LE DEFENDEUR AU POURVOI AYANT L'UN ET L'AUTRE CONSTITUE AVOCAT ET DES MEMOIRES AYANT ETE DEPOSES PAR L'AVOCAT DU DEMANDEUR, L'AFFAIRE, NON INSCRITE AU ROLE DE L'AUDIENCE DE CE JOUR, N'EST PAS EN ETAT D'ETRE JUGEE ;
RENVOIE EN CONSEQUENCE, LA CAUSE ET LES PARTIES A L'AUDIENCE DU 21 JUIN 1961 ;
ARRET N° 3 :
(TRIBUNAL D'INSTANCE DE BASTIA, 7 JANVIER 1961.)
N° 61-60.036.
BAGNOLI C/ FILIPPI ET AUTRES.
PRESIDENT : M. CAMBOULIVES, CONSEILLER DOYEN, FAISANT FONCTIONS. - RAPPORTEUR : M. BOURCELIN. - AVOCAT GENERAL : M. ALBUCHER.