Husband's Appeal Inadmissible Due to Lack of Standing
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe Court of Cassation declared an appeal inadmissible because the appellant, the husband, was not a formal party in the initial proceedings, despite his presence, as the lower court's decision indicated that only his wife was a litigant and he appeared solely for her representation; therefore, only the wife had the standing to appeal the first instance decision, and since she did not appeal, her subsequent appeal was inadmissible, and the husband's appeal was also rejected as unfounded because he lacked the requisite standing.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IADECLARE LE POURVOI DE DAME CREUZET Z, REJETTE LE POURVOI DU SIEUR Y; Husband's Appeal Inadmissible Due to Lack of Standing: The Court of Cassation declared an appeal inadmissible because the appellant, the husband, was not a formal party in the initial proceedings, despite his presence, as the lower court's decision indicated that only his wife was a litigant and he appeared solely for her representation; therefore, only the wife had the standing to appeal the first instance decision, and since she did not appeal, her subsequent appeal was inadmissible, and the husband's appeal was also rejected as unfounded because he lacked the requisite standing.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IADispositions légales citées
Généré par l'IADécisions connexes
Généré par l'IAQuestions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator
Généré par l'IAThis is an order related to the outcome of the appeal for one party (DAME CREUZET Z... - implicitly, the appeal was rejected or deemed inadmissible based on the following order).
This is the operative order rejecting the appeal (pourvoi) filed by Mr. Y...
Texte complet
SUR LE MOYEN UNIQUE : ATTENDU QUE LES EPOUX Y... FONT GRIEF A LA DECISION ATTAQUEE D'AVOIR DECLARE IRRECEVABLE L'APPEL FORME PAR LE SIEUR Y... AU MOTIF QU'IL N'ETAIT PAS PARTIE EN PREMIERE INSTANCE, ALORS QUE LA DECISION DES PREMIERS JUGES PRECISE QUE LE SIEUR Y... A COMPARU DEVANT EUX ;
MAIS ATTENDU QU'IL RESULTE DES ENONCIATIONS DE CETTE DECISION, D'UNE PART, QUE SEULE LA DAME Y... ETAIT PARTIE AUX DEBATS, D'AUTRE PART, QUE SON MARI N'A COMPARU QUE POUR LA REPRESENTER ;
QU'AINSI, LADITE DAME X... SEULE QUALITE POUR INTERJETER APPEL DE LA DECISION DE PREMIERE INSTANCE QUE, NE L'AYANT PAS FAIT, SON POURVOI EST IRRECEVABLE, LE MOYEN PRODUIT PAR LE SIEUR Y... A L'APPUI DE SON POURVOI N'ETANT, D'AUTRE PART, PAS FONDE ;
PAR CES MOTIFS : DECLARE LE POURVOI DE DAME CREUZET Z... ;
REJETTE LE POURVOI DU SIEUR Y.... NO 57-50.938. DAME Y... DENISE ET AUTRE C/ CAISSE D'ALLOCATIONS FAMILIALES DU LOT-ET-GARONNE. PRESIDENT : M. BROUCHOT. - RAPPORTEUR : M. TETAUD. - AVOCAT GENERAL : M. AMOR. A RAPPROCHER : 10 MAI 1957, BULL. 1957, II, NO 345, P. 228.