Acquiescence to Judgment by Payment of Seizure Debt
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe court declared the appeal inadmissible because the parties against whom a judgment confirming a seizure for a debt of 930,000 francs had been issued effectively acquiesced to that judgment by accepting the payment of the full judgment amount, including costs, remitted to the opposing party's counsel by the judicial sequestrator via bank check on November 21, 1957, shortly after the judgment was served on September 21, 1957, and following notification of the sequestrator's intent to pay on November 6, 1957, constituting an unreserved acceptance of the basis for the condemnation.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IANON APPLICABLE; Acquiescence to Judgment by Payment of Seizure Debt: The court declared the appeal inadmissible because the parties against whom a judgment confirming a seizure for a debt of 930,000 francs had been issued effectively acquiesced to that judgment by accepting the payment of the full judgment amount, including costs, remitted to the opposing party's counsel by the judicial sequestrator via bank check on November 21, 1957, shortly after the judgment was served on September 21, 1957, and following notification of the sequestrator's intent to pay on November 6, 1957, constituting an unreserved acceptance of the basis for the condemnation.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IADispositions légales citées
Généré par l'IADécisions connexes
Généré par l'IAQuestions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe dispositive explicitly declares the appeal inadmissible based on the reasoning provided (payment implying acquiescence), but does not cite a specific legal article (like a procedural code article) for the declaration of inadmissibility itself.
Texte complet
N° 429 SUR LA FIN DE NON-RECEVOIR SOULEVEE PAR LA DEFENSE : ATTENDU QUE L'ARRET CONFIRMATIF ATTAQUE A VALIDE LA SAISIE-ARRET PRATIQUEE PAR CARDONNE AU PREJUDICE DES CONSORTS X... POUR SURETE D'UNE CREANCE DE 930000 FRANCS EN PRINCIPAL ;
QUE CET ARRET A ETE SIGNIFIE AUX CONSORTS X... LE 21 SEPTEMBRE 1957 ;
QU'ARNAUD, SEQUESTRE JUDICIAIRE DES FONDS SAISIS, A, PAR LETTRE DU 6 NOVEMBRE 1957, INFORME L'AVOUE DE CARDONNE QU'IL ENTENDAIT REGLER LES SOMMES DUES A CE DERNIER ET QU'A LA SUITE DES JUSTIFICATIONS QUI LUI ONT ETE ADRESSEES, IL A, EN EFFET, ENVOYE AUDIT AVOUE, LE 21 NOVEMBRE SUIVANT, UN CHEQUE BANCAIRE DE 1263769 FRANCS DONT IL LUI A ETE ACCUSE RECEPTION ;
QU'IL SUIT DE LA, QUE, PAR LE PAIEMENT SANS RESERVE FAIT EN LEUR NOM DES CAUSES DE LA CONDAMNATION ET DES FRAIS ET DEPENS, LES CONSORTS X... ONT ACQUIESCE A L'ARRET, ET QUE LEUR POURVOI EST IRRECEVABLE ;
PAR CES MOTIFS : DECLARE IRRECEVABLE LE POURVOI FORME CONTRE L'ARRET RENDU LE 13 JUIN 1957 PAR LA COUR D'APPEL D'ALGER N° 57 12 779 CONSORTS X... C/ CARDONNE PRESIDENT ET RAPPORTEUR : M BORNET - AVOCAT GENERAL : M BLANCHET - AVOCATS : MM TALAMON ET HERSANT.