Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
JURITEXT000006955423 Généré par l'IA

Labor Appeal Timeliness: Algerian Judgment Served on Metropolitan French Resident

Numéro de cause JURITEXT000006955423
Autorité / Tribunal
Juridiction France (FR)
Date de la décision
Issue du litige Admis (Allowed)
Ouvrir la source officielle Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Synthèse Legislator

Généré par l'IA

The civil tribunal erred by declaring an appeal untimely, as the initial ruling was a labor court decision rendered in Algeria, served on a party in Algeria, while the appealing party was domiciled in Metropolitan France; under the relevant labor and civil procedure codes, the ten-day appeal period for a judgment served in Algeria should have been extended by one month for the party domiciled in Algeria when the opposing party resided in Metropolitan France, leading the higher court to quash the judgment and refer the case for a new hearing in Blida.

Regeste Legislator

Généré par l'IA

ARTICLES 74 ET 88, LIVRE IV DU CODE DU TRAVAIL, 5, 73 ET 1033, ALINEA 2, DU CODE DE PROCEDURE CIVILE; Labor Appeal Timeliness: Algerian Judgment Served on Metropolitan French Resident: The civil tribunal erred by declaring an appeal untimely, as the initial ruling was a labor court decision rendered in Algeria, served on a party in Algeria, while the appealing party was domiciled in Metropolitan France; under the relevant labor and civil procedure codes, the ten-day appeal period for a judgment served in Algeria should have been extended by one month for the party domiciled in Algeria when the opposing party resided in Metropolitan France, leading the higher court to quash the judgment and refer the case for a new hearing in Blida.

Mots-clés

Généré par l'IA
jugement civil audition des parties délais de recours administration du travail qualité pour recourir recours du personnel

Dispositions légales citées

Généré par l'IA
ARTICLES 74 ET 88, LIVRE IV DU CODE DU TRAVAIL
These articles, combined with others, establish the legal basis for extending the appeal deadline for parties residing in Algeria when the opposing party is domiciled in Metropolitan France, which was violated by the lower court's decision.
5, 73 ET 1033, ALINEA 2, DU CODE DE PROCEDURE CIVILE
These articles, combined with others, establish the legal basis for extending the appeal deadline for parties residing in Algeria when the opposing party is domiciled in Metropolitan France, which was violated by the lower court's decision.
Généré par l'IA
15-10555
Worker Incapacity Benefits Appeal: Improper Service on Algerian Resident
11-30138
Pension Appeal Dismissal Over Improper Service to Algerian Resident
2406957
Algerian National v. Prefecture: Appeal Timeliness Regarding Residence Permit Refusal
2406916
Algerian National's Untimely Appeal Against Departure Order Dismissed
23MA00851
Algerian National's Appeal on Residence Permit Refusal Deemed Inadmissible Due to Late Filing

Questions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator

Généré par l'IA
ARTICLES 74 ET 88, LIVRE IV DU CODE DU TRAVAIL

These articles, combined with others, establish the legal basis for extending the appeal deadline for parties residing in Algeria when the opposing party is domiciled in Metropolitan France, which was violated by the lower court's decision.

5, 73 ET 1033, ALINEA 2, DU CODE DE PROCEDURE CIVILE

These articles, combined with others, establish the legal basis for extending the appeal deadline for parties residing in Algeria when the opposing party is domiciled in Metropolitan France, which was violated by the lower court's decision.

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cet arrêt s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez cette décision avec la législation fédérale, le droit cantonal, la doctrine et la jurisprudence subséquente dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Texte complet

SUR LE MOYEN UNIQUE : VU LES ARTICLES 74 ET 88, LIVRE IV DU CODE DU TRAVAIL, 5, 73 ET 1033, ALINEA 2, DU CODE DE PROCEDURE CIVILE ;

ATTENDU QU'EN VERTU DE CES TEXTES, LE DELAI DE DIX JOURS SUIVANT LA SIGNIFICATION DU JUGEMENT PREVU POUR L'APPEL D'UNE SENTENCE PRUD'HOMALE EST AUGMENTE D'UN MOIS POUR CEUX QUI DEMEURENT EN ALGERIE, LORSQUE LA PARTIE INTIMEE EST DOMICILIEE EN FRANCE METROPOLITAINE ;

OR, ATTENDU QUE LE JUGEMENT ATTAQUE A DECLARE IRRECEVABLE COMME TARDIF L'APPEL D'UNE SENTENCE RENDUE PAR LE CONSEIL DES PRUD'HOMMES D'ALGER AU PROFIT DE FOUCRE, ALORS QUE CETTE SENTENCE AVAIT ETE SIGNIFIEE LE 1ER DECEMBRE 1958 A LA SOCIETE DE L'HOTEL SAINT-GEORGES A ALGER ET L'APPEL INTERJETE PAR CELLE-CI SIGNIFIE LE 12 DECEMBRE 1958 A FOUCRE, DOMICILIE A DEAUVILLE (CALVADOS) ;

D'OU IL SUIT QU'EN STATUANT AINSI, LE TRIBUNAL CIVIL A VIOLE LES TEXTES VISES AU MOYEN ;

PAR CES MOTIFS : CASSE ET ANNULE LE JUGEMENT RENDU ENTRE LES PARTIES PAR LE TRIBUNAL DE GRANDE INSTANCE D'ALGER LE 25 JUIN 1959 ;

REMET EN CONSEQUENCE LA CAUSE ET LES PARTIES AU MEME ET SEMBLABLE ETAT OU ELLES ETAIENT AVANT LEDIT JUGEMENT ET, POUR ETRE FAIT DROIT, LES RENVOIE DEVANT LE TRIBUNAL DE GRANDE INSTANCE DE BLIDA. NO 59-40.839. SOCIETE IMMOBILIERE DE L'HOTEL SAINT-GEORGES C/ FOUCRE. PRESIDENT : M. VERDIER. - RAPPORTEUR : M. DURAND. AVOCAT GENERAL :

M. X.... AVOCATS : MM. DEFERT ET VIDART.