Property Owner v. Neighboring Entity (Continuing Tort Doctrine)
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAA property owner sued a neighboring entity seeking removal of an encroaching structure and damages, arguing the construction violated setback requirements, but the appellate court dismissed the claim, finding the action time-barred because the construction had been completed for over thirty years without objection. The high court quashed this decision, reasoning that the permanent encroachment constituted a continuing tort, meaning the statute of limitations did not begin to run until the cessation of the obstruction, thus making the claim for removal of the continuous violation still actionable.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAProperty Owner v. Neighboring Entity (Continuing Tort Doctrine): The high court quashed this decision, reasoning that the permanent encroachment constituted a continuing tort, meaning the statute of limitations did not begin to run until the cessation of the obstruction, thus making the claim for removal of the continuous violation still actionable.