Seller's Claim for Payment Rejected Due to Non-Conforming Goods

The dispute concerned a seller's claim for payment of goods delivered to a buyer, with the buyer asserting that the delivered items were non-conforming due to defects that rendered them unusable for their intended purpose, thus justifying refusal to pay and demanding cancellation of the sale. The Court of Cassation upheld the lower court's decision to reject the seller's claim, reasoning that the trial judge, within their discretionary power to assess the evidence, correctly determined that the defects identified by the expert report effectively meant the delivered items did not meet the agreed-upon quality and were unfit for the purpose for which they were sold, justifying the buyer's refusal to execute the contract and the resulting dismissal of the seller's demand for payment.