Objective Proof Required for Contractual Non-Performance Claims

A dispute arose concerning a contract where one party claimed the other had failed to fulfill its obligations, specifically alleging non-performance or defective performance of the contracted services. The lower court, in its decision, relied on the subjective belief of the party claiming breach regarding the extent of the failure, without objectively verifying the extent of the alleged non-performance or its legal consequences under the contract. The high court quashed the ruling, holding that a party seeking judicial resolution based on alleged non-performance must provide objective proof establishing the extent of the breach, as the mere subjective assertion of failure is insufficient to legally justify termination or damages under the agreement.