Creditor's Seizure vs. Good Faith Third-Party Purchaser of Movable Property

A case arose concerning a debt where the creditor, after obtaining an enforceable judgment, initiated enforcement proceedings against the debtor's movable property; however, the debtor subsequently transferred ownership of the seized property to a third party who was unaware of the enforcement action, leading to a dispute over the validity of this transfer against the creditor's rights. The court held that the seizure, which renders the seized property inalienable, produced an immediate effect against all parties, including third parties, meaning that the subsequent transfer of ownership by the debtor to a third party, even if made in good faith and without knowledge of the seizure, could not prevail against the rights established by the prior judicial attachment, thus justifying the cassation of any decision that invalidated the seizure's effect on the transferred property.