Appeal Inadmissibility Due to Procedural Non-Compliance
France (FR)
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe appeal filed against a decision from a local arbitration court dated February 4, 1959, was declared inadmissible because the procedural requirements for such appeals were not met; specifically, the appealing party submitted the appeal via a registered letter to the registry on April 4, 1959, whereas the relevant texts require appeals against decisions of parity jurisdictions to be submitted in the form of a petition for annulment signed by an attorney practicing before the high courts, following the abrogation of certain articles of the Rural Code by a decree of August 5, 1957.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAARTICLE 13, PARAGRAPHE 7, DU DECRET DU 5 AOUT 1957, ARTICLE 15 DE LA LOI DU 23 JUILLET 1947; Appeal Inadmissibility Due to Procedural Non-Compliance: The appeal filed against a decision from a local arbitration court dated February 4, 1959, was declared inadmissible because the procedural requirements for such appeals were not met; specifically, the appealing party submitted the appeal via a registered letter to the registry on April 4, 1959, whereas the relevant texts require appeals against decisions of parity jurisdictions to be submitted in the form of a petition for annulment signed by an attorney practicing before the high courts, following the abrogation of certain articles of the Rural Code by a decree of August 5, 1957.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IADispositions légales citées
Généré par l'IADécisions connexes
Généré par l'IAQuestions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator
Généré par l'IACited as the provision determining the grounds for declaring the appeal inadmissible based on procedural requirements for appeals against decisions from parity jurisdictions.
Cited to establish the required form for filing appeals against decisions of parity jurisdictions, which was not followed.
Texte complet
SUR LA RECEVABILITE DU POURVOI : VU L'ARTICLE 13, PARAGRAPHE 7, DU DECRET DU 5 AOUT 1957 ;
ATTENDU QUE CE TEXTE ABROGE LES ALINEAS 2, 3 ET 4 DE L'ARTICLE 979 DU CODE RURAL;
QU'IL EN RESULTE QUE LES POURVOIS DIRIGES CONTRE LES DECISIONS DES JURIDICTIONS PARITAIRES DOIVENT ETRE FORMES, CONFORMEMENT A L'ARTICLE 15 DE LA LOI DU 23 JUILLET 1947, RELATIVE A L'ORGANISATION ET A LA PROCEDURE DE LA COUR DE CASSATION, PAR UNE REQUETE EN FORME DE VUE D'ARRET SIGNEE PAR UN AVOCAT A LA COUR DE CASSATION ET AU CONSEIL D'ETAT ;
OR, ATTENDU QUE POINTARD A DECLARE, PAR LETTRE RECOMMANDEE DU 4 AVRIL 1959 ADRESSEE AU GREFFE DE LA COUR DE CASSATION SE POURVOIR CONTRE UN JUGEMENT DU TRIBUNAL PARITAIRE D'ARRONDISSEMENT DE CHATEAU-CHINON EN DATE DU 4 FEVRIER 1959 ;
QUE CE POURVOI EST IRRECEVABLE ;
PAR CES MOTIFS : DECLARE IRRECEVABLE LE POURVOI FORME CONTRE LE JUGEMENT RENDU LE 4 FEVRIER 1959 PAR LE TRIBUNAL PARITAIRE D'ARRONDISSEMENT DE CHATEAU-CHINON