Land Purchase Option Validity Dispute

The case involved a dispute where an individual, having contracted for the purchase of land with an option to acquire additional adjoining plots, exercised the option for one plot but subsequently contested the validity of the contract concerning the other plots, alleging that the option agreement lacked the specific description required for a promise of sale under the relevant civil code provisions. The court rejected the appeal, reasoning that the initial agreement, despite not containing the exact surface area of the adjoining plots, sufficiently identified the subject matter by referencing existing cadastral descriptions and clear boundaries, thereby satisfying the legal requirement for the identification of the property subject to the option to purchase.