Appeal Inadmissibility Due to Procedural Defects
Synthèse Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe appeal filed against a decision from the Justice of the Peace of La Porta on February 25, 1959, was declared inadmissible because the statement of appeal lacked any specific grounds or cited any violated legal text, and no supplementary brief was filed to remedy this omission; furthermore, the case file only contained an incomplete judgment extract lacking mention of the required warning to the involved parties, thereby violating formal procedural requirements necessitating the declaration of inadmissibility to allow the higher court to exercise proper review.
Regeste Legislator
Généré par l'IAARTICLE 1ER DU TITRE IV DU REGLEMENT DU 28 JUIN 1738, ARTICLE 141 DU CODE DE PROCEDURE CIVILE; Appeal Inadmissibility Due to Procedural Defects: The appeal filed against a decision from the Justice of the Peace of La Porta on February 25, 1959, was declared inadmissible because the statement of appeal lacked any specific grounds or cited any violated legal text, and no supplementary brief was filed to remedy this omission; furthermore, the case file only contained an incomplete judgment extract lacking mention of the required warning to the involved parties, thereby violating formal procedural requirements necessitating the declaration of inadmissibility to allow the higher court to exercise proper review.
Mots-clés
Généré par l'IADispositions légales citées
Généré par l'IADécisions connexes
Généré par l'IAQuestions juridiques clés extraites par Legislator
Généré par l'IAThe appeal was declared inadmissible because the appellant violated this formal provision regarding the content of the appeal.
The appeal was declared inadmissible because the appellant violated this formal procedural provision.
The appeal was declared inadmissible due to the appellant's non-compliance with this formal provision.
Texte complet
ATTENDU QUE LA DECLARATION DE POURVOI FORMEE PAR LA DAME X..., EPOUSE Y..., CONTRE UNE DECISION EN DATE DU 25 FEVRIER 1959, RENDUE PAR LE JUGE DE PAIX DU CANTON DE LA PORTA, NE CONTIENT AUCUN MOYEN ET NE VISE AUCUN TEXTE QUI AURAIT ETE VIOLE OU FAUSSEMENT APPLIQUE;
QUE CETTE OMISSION N'A ETE REPAREE PAR LA PRODUCTION D'AUCUN MEMOIRE AMPLIATIF;
QUE LE DOSSIER N'EST ASSORTI QUE D'UN EXTRAIT DE JUGEMENT INCOMPLET NE PERMETTANT PAS A LA COUR DE CASSATION D'EXERCER SON CONTROLE SUR LA REGULARITE DE LA DECISION ATTAQUEE, SANS AUCUNE MENTION DE L'AVERTISSEMENT AUX DIFFERENTES PARTIES EN CAUSE;
QUE LA DEMANDERESSE A AINSI CONTREVENU AUX DISPOSITIONS FORMELLES DE L'ARTICLE 1ER DU TITRE IV DU REGLEMENT DU 28 JUIN 1738, A L'ARTICLE 141 DU CODEDE PROCEDURE CIVILE ET A L'ARTICLE 28 DU CODE ELECTORAL (ARTICLE 22 DU DECRET ORGANIQUE DU 2 FEVRIER 1852);
DECLARE, EN CONSEQUENCE, IRRECEVABLE, LE POURVOI FORME CONTRE LE JUGEMENT RENDU LE 25 FEVRIER 1959 PAR LE JUGE DE PAIX DE LA PORTA.