Liability for Damages Following Annulled Seizure

A party sought damages following the seizure of movable property under an execution order that was subsequently annulled, but the lower court rejected the claim, ruling that the damages suffered were the direct consequence of the nullity of the initial act and thus the responsibility fell on the entity that initiated the seizure. The high court quashed this decision, reasoning that the seizure, even if based on a nullifiable title, constituted a fault by the seizing party who failed to ensure the regularity of the execution procedure, making them liable for the resulting damages regardless of the later annulment of the underlying title.