Administrative Contract Revocation Due to Non-Performance

A party appealed a decision that ordered the revocation of a public administrative contract based on the other party's failure to execute obligations stipulated in the agreement, arguing that the administrative authority could not unilaterally revoke such a contract without a formal legal provision permitting it and that the non-performance justifying revocation was not sufficiently established. The court rejected the appeal, reasoning that the administrative authority retains the power, inherent in its supervisory role and implied in the contract itself, to unilaterally terminate a public service contract due to the concessionaire's failure to perform their obligations, as this power is necessary to ensure the continuity and proper functioning of the public service, provided such non-performance is duly established.